I see mentioned on a semi-regular basis that people complain that a watercooled system is too much to maintain. I am curious what other people's thoughts are on this.
I watercooled two computers for a friend of mine last year. Both are cooled passively by a car radiator. He is the type that thinks that his machines should just run no matter how much he abuses and non-maintains them. I set him up with eheim 1250s, swiftech cpu blocks, and a pvc tube res on both. I did this last summer around June. I took him to watercooling for silence, and he loves that. I also felt I could get his computers to run more reliably on water since he never blows out the dust.
I just went over his place this weekend and flushed/refilled everything. As I expected, he has done absolutely nothing to them for maintenance. I had to take them outside and blow clouds of dust out of them and then flush/refill them. I put about 20% antifreeze with algaecide and iodine in the loop. There was ZERO growth or corrosion after 10 months of use.
If these systems were on air, they would have clogged up with dust and overheated long ago. I find that with air cooling, I have to blow the dust out about every two weeks to keep things from getting clogged up. With watercooling (passive car rad), I can go like 2 months before having to blow dust out of the case fans. And as for changing fluid, I don't go more than about every six months to be on the safe side, but like I said, we went 10 months on his with no problem.
Do you think watercooling requires more maintenance than aircooling? Do you think watercooling requires more frequent maintenance, or is the maintenance harder to do than air? Which one do you think is harder to upkeep?
I watercooled two computers for a friend of mine last year. Both are cooled passively by a car radiator. He is the type that thinks that his machines should just run no matter how much he abuses and non-maintains them. I set him up with eheim 1250s, swiftech cpu blocks, and a pvc tube res on both. I did this last summer around June. I took him to watercooling for silence, and he loves that. I also felt I could get his computers to run more reliably on water since he never blows out the dust.
I just went over his place this weekend and flushed/refilled everything. As I expected, he has done absolutely nothing to them for maintenance. I had to take them outside and blow clouds of dust out of them and then flush/refill them. I put about 20% antifreeze with algaecide and iodine in the loop. There was ZERO growth or corrosion after 10 months of use.
If these systems were on air, they would have clogged up with dust and overheated long ago. I find that with air cooling, I have to blow the dust out about every two weeks to keep things from getting clogged up. With watercooling (passive car rad), I can go like 2 months before having to blow dust out of the case fans. And as for changing fluid, I don't go more than about every six months to be on the safe side, but like I said, we went 10 months on his with no problem.
Do you think watercooling requires more maintenance than aircooling? Do you think watercooling requires more frequent maintenance, or is the maintenance harder to do than air? Which one do you think is harder to upkeep?