PDA

View Full Version : ATA 133 or UDMA 100?


Gandalf
12-15-01, 03:09 PM
Whats the difference here? Is there a big price difference?

Jon
12-15-01, 03:14 PM
I've not noticed any price difference in anything other than the controllers they each take. The ATA133 controllers ARE more than the ATA100 ones.

As far as performance goes...don't really know. I would assume not much since ATA100 still doesn't even meet ATA66 specs. May be a marked increase but I would say it's best to get one considering there isn't a price difference in the drives themselves. Far as I know, Maxtor is the only one producing them at the moment.

Gandalf
12-15-01, 03:26 PM
So whats the difference between UDMA 100 and ATA 133......

(and ATA 133 is faster than ATA 66 right?)

Jon
12-15-01, 03:38 PM
ATA100 = 100MBps maximum burst throughput

ATA133 = 133MBps maximum burst throughput

Gandalf
12-15-01, 03:55 PM
Whats UDMA 100 though?

Godfodda
12-15-01, 04:02 PM
Originally posted by GaDaLf
Whats UDMA 100 though?

ATA and UDMA are (more or less) interchangeable terms.

Gandalf
12-15-01, 04:07 PM
SO if I understand this correctly...

ATA 133

is better than

ATA 100

right?

Warlord2
12-15-01, 04:13 PM
you could tell in a benchmark between the two but you wouldnt notice when your just fooling around on the computer:D

Samzik
12-15-01, 04:47 PM
there is no thing like udm 100 its udm 5 and yes its quicker then udma 4 but how they are diferd i dont know i know ata 66 is udma 4 ata 100 udm5 and i think ata 133 udma 6

Gandalf
12-15-01, 05:26 PM
Thanx, this makes sense now.....

Yodums
12-15-01, 07:17 PM
Originally posted by GaDaLf
SO if I understand this correctly...

ATA 133

is better than

ATA 100

right?

Obviously ATA 133 is quicker as long as your HDD will support it.

Its like 100mhz and 133mhz, 133 is defintely going to be faster.

Warlord2
12-15-01, 09:14 PM
I wouldnt even say quicker even......maybe more bandwidth but unless you increase the speed of the hard drive it wont be really any quicker