Which stats site do you use and why?

[dfonda]

Which stats site do you use and why? Also post a link so we can check them out.

I use EOC seems to give me the lowest average and I like to be motivated.:)

http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/user_list.php?s=&t=32&p=1

[harlam357]

I use EOC b/c I'm addicted to it. :D

[benbaked]

I used to check fahstats/kakao but that site always has a few second lag. I pretty much only check eoc nowadays.

[hibner]

I stick with EOC. (http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/) All the others either don't last or act to flaky.

[Gunlance]

EOC all the way.

[deadlysyn]

I used to use Stanfords site, but then I found out about EOC. I use it pretty much exclusively since it does show quite a bit more information than Stanford.

[dfonda]

I used to use Stanfords site, but then I found out about EOC. I use it pretty much exclusively since it does show quite a bit more information than Stanford.
I usually check Stanfords site if I think there is something missing.

Wow I thought there would be more variety, but its nice that alot of us are looking at the same thing.

[WarriorII]

I use EOC, but like to check fahstats too.

stats shows active users as to EOC's all members list.

[thideras]

EOC because it shows alot of information in a very simple way.

It also loads very fast and stays easy to read on my Treo 700p.

[Sorin]

I didn't think there'd be much diversity, really. EOC seems to be the go-to site for people like us. I've occasionally checked another site or two, but that's rare. I do check Stanford's stats page every now and again because unlike EOC, Stanford shows the number of active processors for each user. It's interesting to see who's doing what with how many clients. Stanford also shows which units the user has done, which can also tell you what someone is running. For example, Zim's points seemed to come almost exclusively from quad cores, as I saw that most of his units were what I understood to be as "quad only". Another example is that while Chasr and Pete aren't that far apart in PPD, Chasr's got 4 times as many clients as Pete! It's interesting trivia like this that makes me check Stanford every now and then.

Now if EOC could integrate number of processors, that'd be neat. :) Although I'd imagine that'd ultimately be up to Stanford, because I guess it may not be included in their 3rd party stats feed thing?

[Mr.Guvernment]

http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/


just like it the way it is laid out