Abit IP35 Pro: BETA BIOS ID:16.B04

P

phu

Member

​

Joined

Oct 22, 2007

Location

Randolph, MA

• Dec 17, 2007

• #1

Any tried this yet? Does it overclock any better?

 

redrumy3

Member

​

Joined

Mar 6, 2006

Location

New York

• Dec 17, 2007

• #2

i use b03 i guess i will flash mine to this one

 

redrumy3

Member

​

Joined

Mar 6, 2006

Location

New York

• Dec 17, 2007

• #3

like this one so far seems to fix a weird issue i had when booting, seems like bios temp reader is buggy on this one though shows like 80c for cpu lol. other than that i like it so far

 

OP

P

phu

Member

​

Joined

Oct 22, 2007

Location

Randolph, MA

• Dec 17, 2007

• Thread Starter
• #4

I am trying it now. Like redrumy3 said, the reading in uGuru seems way off though.

 

Last edited: Dec 17, 2007

BLOOP!

Member

​

Joined

Feb 5, 2006

Location

Los Angeles, CA

• Dec 17, 2007

• #5

So hows this BIOS doing? anyone getting better clocks?

 

OP

P

phu

Member

​

Joined

Oct 22, 2007

Location

Randolph, MA

• Dec 17, 2007

• Thread Starter
• #6

So far:
1. The cpu reading in uGuru is way off. Just starting up the computer, it shows 52C.

2. I specifically set the voltage for RAM as 2.175V in the bios but uGuru shows 2.2V.

 

OP

P

phu

Member

​

Joined

Oct 22, 2007

Location

Randolph, MA

• Dec 17, 2007

• Thread Starter
• #7

I tried same settings I had under bios 14 on this new bios and it failed in prime95 in 3 minutes.

 

redrumy3

Member

​

Joined

Mar 6, 2006

Location

New York

• Dec 17, 2007

• #8

phu said:

I tried same settings I had under bios 14 on this new bios and it failed in prime95 in 3 minutes.

Click to expand...

hmm weird, everything seems fine on my end with this bios

 

OP

P

phu

Member

​

Joined

Oct 22, 2007

Location

Randolph, MA

• Dec 18, 2007

• Thread Starter
• #9

Which revision do you have? I have 1.1...wonder if that makes a difference.

 

Evilsizer

Senior Forum Spammer

​

Joined

Jun 6, 2002

• Dec 18, 2007

• #10

well the betsa 03 was to fix issues people were having with the QX9650 45nm cpus. i wouldnt upgrade to it expecting better ocing. esp if your computer is ocing just fine and stable at that. revision can make a difference but in this case it shouldnt be affecting the new boards, though i admit that is odd.

 

redrumy3

Member

​

Joined

Mar 6, 2006

Location

New York

• Dec 18, 2007

• #11

phu said:

Which revision do you have? I have 1.1...wonder if that makes a difference.

Click to expand...

1.1 also

 

T

tjh566

Member

​

Joined

Jun 24, 2003

Location

Va

• Dec 18, 2007

• #12

I run the b04 BIOS, no change in overclocking. From the 14 bios to the 16b03 I gained some overclocking though.

No problems with it.

Problem Ive always had is uguru never working right any bios, If I overclock in uguru after a few seconds of load the system locks up, same overclock in bios no problem.

 

OP

P

phu

Member

​

Joined

Oct 22, 2007

Location

Randolph, MA

• Dec 24, 2007

• Thread Starter
• #13

Oh well, I don't seem to have much luck with this beta...Going back to 14 for now.