View Full Version : Need for MORE power(or not?)
Henry Rollins II
01-11-02, 11:03 PM
Yo all,
in the quest of "how big PS do I need" I have found out quite a few things, but Iīm not sure if I am any closer to my goalī...:confused:
CPU: AMD Athlon XP series(1500-2000) requires 55-63 watts of power typical and 60-70 watts max, depending on model. Those figures are for standard voltage(1,75v). O/C to 1.85v is about 4-7 watts more, assuming that the current stays the same.
Hard disk(s): A 7200 rpm ATA/100 disk requires 12-14 watts of power during read/write/seek. 7-8 watts during idle. During start-up: 20-30 watts.
CD/CD-RW/DVD: 12-17 watts max, almost nothing at idle.
Motherboard/Video card: This is where it start to be real hard. The only reference I found here were documents about AMDīs 760 north/southbridge components. They consume about 6 watts toghether, which leads me to wonder why most manufacturers choose to use a fan for cooling. Is it a sales trick or is the fan really useful?
Unfortunatley I couldnīt find any tech info about the video chips themselves, but if we compare the cooling on the average video card with the cooling of most northbridge chips, it would seem that a video CPU would produce about the same heat as the northbridge chip. Say 200% more to be sure - 15 watts.
I havenīt checked out memory modules/chips yet.
Sound/Network/TV/RAID etc: No heatsinks, no fans, no heat=low power consumption. Canīt tell how much though, 1-2 watts per card?
Sources: Tech PDF files from AMD, Quantum, Maxtor, IBM, Seagate, Aopen, Plextor.
If anyone knows for sure about this, or where I can find the missing numbers, please tell me.
Summary
CPU(75w)+MB /w memory+FanHS+2 HDD+DVD+CD/RW+Video+Sound+RAID+3 case fans=about 220w maximum. :eh?:
O/C or not makes as far as I can tell almost no difference, from a power point of view.
CONCLUSION
If these figures are even near the truth, an ordinary 300W PS(assuming it delivers true 300W) would be enough for almost everybody, not including dual-AMD systems. 400 or even 500 watt PS seem to be a huge overkill.
best of regards,
Henry.
Ridenow
01-11-02, 11:31 PM
Originally posted by Henry Rollins II
CONCLUSION
If these figures are even near the truth, an ordinary 300W PS(assuming it delivers true 300W) would be enough for almost everybody, not including dual-AMD systems. 400 or even 500 watt PS seem to be a huge overkill.
Agreed.
I run a Sparkle 350W with a RAID, all my IDE channels full, some SCSI drives, many fans and much more.
250W is enough for most systems.
wild_andy_c
01-12-02, 04:18 AM
You do omit to detail any differences between the PSU demands of bi-phase, 3-phase and quad-phase power regulation circuitries and the size of capacitation.
Please do detail your recommendations based on these three readily marketed power solutions on Socket A and P4 systems.
wild_andy_c
01-12-02, 04:19 AM
bi-phase = MSI KT266A board RU with USB 2.0
3-phase = Iwill KK266Plus R
quad-phase = EPoX 8K7A+
Henry Rollins II
01-12-02, 06:30 AM
Originally posted by wild_andy_c
You do omit to detail any differences between the PSU demands of bi-phase, 3-phase and quad-phase power regulation circuitries and the size of capacitation.
Please do detail your recommendations based on these three readily marketed power solutions on Socket A and P4 systems.
Are you stoned?
regards,
Henry.
Henry, this is just what I was looking for. Helps out a ton.
Cbone
Ridenow
01-12-02, 03:25 PM
Originally posted by Henry Rollins II
Are you stoned?
regards,
Henry.
Our crazy_uk_guy is very knowledgeable and would probably be right even if he was stoned.
In this case I am not exactly sure what he is talking about, somehing about the power requirements of different motherboards. If he gets a chance he will explain.
Maximus Nickus
01-12-02, 04:56 PM
Happy Gilmore Avatar. Not bad. Wild_andy knows his stuff, plus he lives in the same town as me!!!
Henry Rollins II
01-12-02, 09:12 PM
Well, maybe wild_andy could speak for himself then?
regards,
Henry.
wild_andy_c
01-13-02, 03:13 AM
Not stoned in the slightest - it's just that you've written a piece which is very well worked, however it doesn't take into account the following points which render its useability a lot lower:-
1. Northbridge power requirement at nominal 2.5v from the combined power area of the PSU. This differs depending on wether a 200MHz or 266MHz CPU is utilized in a default configuration.
2. Differentiation of different power phase systems - 2 phase requires less combined (3.3v and 5v) power than 3 phase and 3 phase requires less than 4 phase.
3. CAS latency and aggressivenes of memory - such settings do take more or less wattage (current in fact) dependant upon how they are set.
I'm not trying to be a bum-hole or anything, just pointing out a few things that may add to your knowledge.
Henry Rollins II
01-13-02, 07:25 AM
Originally posted by wild_andy_c
Not stoned in the slightest - it's just that you've written a piece which is very well worked, however it doesn't take into account the following points which render its useability a lot lower:-
1. Northbridge power requirement at nominal 2.5v from the combined power area of the PSU. This differs depending on wether a 200MHz or 266MHz CPU is utilized in a default configuration.
2. Differentiation of different power phase systems - 2 phase requires less combined (3.3v and 5v) power than 3 phase and 3 phase requires less than 4 phase.
3. CAS latency and aggressivenes of memory - such settings do take more or less wattage (current in fact) dependant upon how they are set.
I'm not trying to be a bum-hole or anything, just pointing out a few things that may add to your knowledge.
1. Yeah....but as it said: Athlon XP. My aim aint really to pin-point exaxt numbers here, just to get a general idea of the total power consumption.
2. No, that is NOT true.
3. Same thing here as in no.1: I am not concerned about small differences(2 watts or less).
The reason for writing this is: I wanted to find out if a standard 300 watt PS would be enough for MY system(as described in the sig.).
I canīt see how your points would render my piece "a lot lower useability". 220 or 222 watts, who cares? Still: A 300 watt PS is enough for almost everybody.
regards,
Henry.
Maximus Nickus
01-13-02, 07:30 AM
I had to use a 350Watt to just boot my 1.3Ghz, so you're not entirely correct, yes a 300Watt PSU is ok for most but every system is different.
wild_andy_c
01-13-02, 07:33 AM
Originally posted by Henry Rollins II
1. Yeah....but as it said: Athlon XP. My aim aint really to pin-point exaxt numbers here, just to get a general idea of the total power consumption.
2. No, that is NOT true.
3. Same thing here as in no.1: I am not concerned about small differences(2 watts or less).
The reason for writing this is: I wanted to find out if a standard 300 watt PS would be enough for MY system(as described in the sig.).
I canīt see how your points would render my piece "a lot lower useability". 220 or 222 watts, who cares? Still: A 300 watt PS is enough for almost everybody.
regards,
Henry.
This goes to prove my point - a 3 phase or 4 phase system does require more power in order to initially boot.
Don't try to hang onto credibility if wrong ! You end up worse off in the end !!
Henry Rollins II
01-13-02, 07:42 AM
Originally posted by nick_cw
I had to use a 350Watt to just boot my 1.3Ghz, so you're not entirely correct, yes a 300Watt PSU is ok for most but every system is different.
...*sigh*...
You see the can at the bottom of my my sig? I had the configuration as it shows now + 1 extra DIMM + 2 more Harddrives + USB scanner without external power + 2 80mm fans.
The reason for you having problems with booting up, is propably that your 16 fans overload one of the PSīoutputs. This combined with the facts that the harddrives consume 100% more power during start-up, may cause that you are unable to boot even though the actual power requirement never is above 300w. Solution: get rid of 14 fans, they are useless anyway.
regards,
Henry.
Henry Rollins II
01-13-02, 07:44 AM
Originally posted by wild_andy_c
This goes to prove my point - a 3 phase or 4 phase system does require more power in order to initially boot.
Don't try to hang onto credibility if wrong ! You end up worse off in the end !!
This is stupid. I ainīt listening to you no more.
regards,
Henry.
wild_andy_c
01-13-02, 08:06 AM
Originally posted by Henry Rollins II
This is stupid. I ainīt listening to you no more.
regards,
Henry.
I won't loose any sleep in the knowledge that I'm correct on this one!
Maximus Nickus
01-13-02, 08:56 AM
Actually I had 3fans when booting it up. And useless are they??? LOOK AT THE WEBSITE ADDRESS OVERCLOCKERS!
Henry Rollins II
01-13-02, 11:25 AM
Originally posted by nick_cw
Actually I had 3fans when booting it up. And useless are they??? LOOK AT THE WEBSITE ADDRESS OVERCLOCKERS!
ROTFLMAO!!!!
Maximus Nickus
01-13-02, 11:29 AM
??????????Wat????
Cool avatar!
Henry Rollins II
01-13-02, 11:33 AM
Originally posted by nick_cw
??????????Wat????
Cool avatar!
Thanx.
=> Rolling On The Floor Laughing My Ass Off. :p
Maximus Nickus
01-13-02, 11:37 AM
Its cool!!!
Laughing my head off to!
wild_andy_c
01-13-02, 03:16 PM
I'm still ROTFLMAO for other reasons in this thread !
It_The_Cow
01-13-02, 03:41 PM
Henry, Andy, try not to let this get out of hand
wild_andy_c
01-13-02, 03:47 PM
I will walk away from this thread. I'm still right though.
M@$ŪÖ
01-14-02, 04:45 PM
Whats the point of debating this out ? Whoever is right or wrong. Its a matter of opinion to some and knowledge to others ;)
Maestro
Maximus Nickus
01-15-02, 10:57 AM
Whats ROTFLMAO????
Henry Rollins II
01-17-02, 06:53 AM
Originally posted by Henry Rollins II
=> Rolling On The Floor Laughing My Ass Off. :p
!(/%Ī@@Ģ$ !!!!!!
regards,
Henry.
lennytiger
01-17-02, 12:34 PM
for reliability go for a 400Watt +
lennytiger
01-17-02, 12:35 PM
or run another at psu just for fans......
Henry Rollins II
01-18-02, 09:03 AM
Or just simply forget about the stupid fans. A serious overclocker is using water cooling. :beer:
regards,
Henry.
lennytiger
01-18-02, 12:23 PM
Originally posted by Henry Rollins II
Or just simply forget about the stupid fans. A serious overclocker is using water cooling. :beer:
regards,
Henry.
You will still want a few fans with water cooling, not enough to have a second PSU just to power them, but you will still need fans...
For your setup, go for 300W+ if go for a 400 it will see you well, it will handle any upgrade you throw at it for a good few years....
Henry Rollins II
01-19-02, 07:38 AM
Nah. It works great with the Antec 300W for now. I even added one more HDD! :eek:
BTW: I got a CPU temp of 49 degrees Celcius, and a case temp of 40 degrees Celcius. :D Ambient=22 degrees. No case fans whatsoever. Whatchu think of that Nick????? :p
regards,
Henry.
Originally posted by Henry Rollins II
Nah. It works great with the Antec 300W for now. I even added one more HDD! :eek:
BTW: I got a CPU temp of 49 degrees Celcius, and a case temp of 40 degrees Celcius. :D Ambient=22 degrees. No case fans whatsoever. Whatchu think of that Nick????? :p
regards,
Henry.
dude! a 40c case temp with a 22c ambient?
ahem
thats WAY too high. you need at least 2 fans on there (one intake and one outtake) but thast all you will probably need.
and about your comment about serious overclockers only using watercooling. thats not correct.
i use pelitiers with air cooling and im probably a more serious overclocker than some people with watercooling :p
fans are needed, i just dont trust water flowing so close to my expensive computer stuff :p. i aircool my pelitiers and use loads of neoprene to fend off the evil condensation demons and im just peachy ;)
Dissolved
01-20-02, 03:03 AM
what the heck is all this...
this forum is suppose to be "G" rated... and as much as i dont wanna be a killer, but i dont think its OK to say others being on illegal subs.....
but neways... wth would u even wanna calulate exactuly what wattage your pc uses neways... just know that if your overclocking and your over 1.2ghz id say you need at least 430w psu.. or a good quality 330w like antec, enermax or sparkle...
i run 300w... and i think thats my hold back..
so just get a 430w and stop this stupid argument about whos on pot and whatever..
just IMO
peace
Henry Rollins II
01-20-02, 11:55 AM
Originally posted by BigRed
dude! a 40c case temp with a 22c ambient?
ahem
thats WAY too high. you need at least 2 fans on there (one intake and one outtake) but thast all you will probably need.
and about your comment about serious overclockers only using watercooling. thats not correct.
i use pelitiers with air cooling and im probably a more serious overclocker than some people with watercooling :p
fans are needed, i just dont trust water flowing so close to my expensive computer stuff :p. i aircool my pelitiers and use loads of neoprene to fend off the evil condensation demons and im just peachy ;)
Naahh...maybe I will use a hairdryer for intake? Still ainīt hot enough. :D
Ok, peltiers, agreed. Thats hardcore too. Most intresteing however, would be a combination of peltier and watercooling, ie. using a peltier element to cool the water.
regards,
Henry.
Go with a 450 PS and we will all sleep better
When in doubt 450!
If your car doesn't Crank 450!
When you want to overclock 450!
When you girl ask you what you are doing tonite, tell her 450!
:beer:
Henry Rollins II
01-21-02, 11:51 AM
Originally posted by Dissolved
but neways... wth would u even wanna calulate exactuly what wattage your pc uses neways... just know that if your overclocking and your over 1.2ghz id say you need at least 430w psu.. or a good quality 330w like antec, enermax or sparkle...
i run 300w... and i think thats my hold back..
so just get a 430w
LOL! Go back to sleep!
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.