Ndi
10-12-08, 05:45 AM
Hi, new here (waves).
I have this PC with a GA-X38T-DQ6, an E6850 and a 2G 2 DIMM kit from Corsair (1600C7DHX) - that being 1600 MHz, CL7, Dual Heat Exchange. The ones that look like they eat other DIMMs.
This is (was?) something of a home overclocker's dream, a good board, one of the best CPUs to ramp up and some RAM that has been tested by Corsair to OC to 1600C7 (SPD claims 1333-9-9-9-27).
What I did was I ramped up the CPU to 3.6 GHz (400x9) and left the RAM to 1333 (now 1600) and CL9 as per specs. It worked fine (after water cooling, case mods and such). Hurray for me, I said, CPU was at 1.325V, which is quite low considering I saw people using 1.5V, RAM was stock voltage and FSB was at +0.10 volts (damned BIOS has relative voltages).
Now, on to my issue. Corsair said on the package that RAM was tested and guaranteed to work at 1600MHz, 7-7-7-21, at 1.7 volts. TESTED. Well, I can't possibly tighten the timings. Any attempt to reduce them from 9-9-9-27 results in BSOD while booting.
If the CPU is stable at 3.6 (I am aware of testing requirements), and the RAM is guaranteed, why don't they work?
Corsair has a page where they did tests with my MB and my RAM and CPU exactly and they ramped up RAM to 1660, but the CPU was at 2800 (400x7), so they lowered the multiplier to get it to work. I haven't tried that yet, since I fail to see the advantage in lowering my CPU frequency by over 20% - I can't possibly gain that much from the tighter timings.
I am really new at OC (but not new at general PC knowledge) so could you please explain why I can't run RAM and CPU high? I am not aware of any link between RAM latency and CPU multiplier.
And if not, am I wrong in assuming I get more from a dual 3.6 GHz (or more - it feels like I could push still) than from a CL7 RAM?
I have this PC with a GA-X38T-DQ6, an E6850 and a 2G 2 DIMM kit from Corsair (1600C7DHX) - that being 1600 MHz, CL7, Dual Heat Exchange. The ones that look like they eat other DIMMs.
This is (was?) something of a home overclocker's dream, a good board, one of the best CPUs to ramp up and some RAM that has been tested by Corsair to OC to 1600C7 (SPD claims 1333-9-9-9-27).
What I did was I ramped up the CPU to 3.6 GHz (400x9) and left the RAM to 1333 (now 1600) and CL9 as per specs. It worked fine (after water cooling, case mods and such). Hurray for me, I said, CPU was at 1.325V, which is quite low considering I saw people using 1.5V, RAM was stock voltage and FSB was at +0.10 volts (damned BIOS has relative voltages).
Now, on to my issue. Corsair said on the package that RAM was tested and guaranteed to work at 1600MHz, 7-7-7-21, at 1.7 volts. TESTED. Well, I can't possibly tighten the timings. Any attempt to reduce them from 9-9-9-27 results in BSOD while booting.
If the CPU is stable at 3.6 (I am aware of testing requirements), and the RAM is guaranteed, why don't they work?
Corsair has a page where they did tests with my MB and my RAM and CPU exactly and they ramped up RAM to 1660, but the CPU was at 2800 (400x7), so they lowered the multiplier to get it to work. I haven't tried that yet, since I fail to see the advantage in lowering my CPU frequency by over 20% - I can't possibly gain that much from the tighter timings.
I am really new at OC (but not new at general PC knowledge) so could you please explain why I can't run RAM and CPU high? I am not aware of any link between RAM latency and CPU multiplier.
And if not, am I wrong in assuming I get more from a dual 3.6 GHz (or more - it feels like I could push still) than from a CL7 RAM?