View Full Version : Apollo Thrill
POL-tec2002
01-14-02, 07:28 PM
why do i only get 44fps on quack 3? is there any way to improve it?
Your cpu is too weak to even push a gf2 hard.
funnyperson1
01-14-02, 07:56 PM
no, a gf2(gts or better) could run 100+fps with that cpu....its the video crad that is holding you back, its about as fast as a Voodoo3/TNT2 Ultra....
Bmxpunk86pl
01-14-02, 08:08 PM
yea man, the cpu is fine. Hell if the games run ok then dont worry about it.
POL-tec2002
01-14-02, 08:09 PM
ok but when i was buying it the people told me that it is better that a gf2.
Zuck Gou :)
01-14-02, 08:32 PM
Originally posted by POL-tec2002
ok but when i was buying it the people told me that it is better that a gf2.
Sorry dude, they tricked ya, or were ignorant.
Try to take it back, if you can get a Radeon or Geforce 2(anything but an MX-200) or a Kyro in exchange then definately do it.
It's better than a GF2mx-200.
Scored 89fps Q3 800x600 on a athlon 800 machine.
http://www.tbreak.com/hard/grfx/3dbudget/page4.html
funnyperson1
01-14-02, 08:41 PM
its better than an MX200, again making it on par with a Voodoo3 3500......also, im willing to bet tthis guys playing at 1024x768x32, and that is why.......
the MX200 will get around 40-50fps at that res
MX400- about 90-100fps
MX same as MX400
GTS-110
Ultra- 160
the MX200 does not deserved to be called a Geforce2....
Yes but the cpu does make a difference, the sis 315 card gets over 100fps in Q3 at 800x600 with a 1200mhz T-bird.
Zuck Gou :)
01-14-02, 09:56 PM
Originally posted by Placid
It's better than a GF2mx.
Scored 89fps Q3 800x600 on a athlon 800 machine.
http://www.tbreak.com/hard/grfx/3dbudget/page4.html
That's an MX-200.
There are 3 card's the one I was referring to is the bright green on the chart, ecs sis 315 the same chip as the apollo 3d thrill.
The other is a GF2MX-200 and a Kyro.
Not sure what you mean.
Maybe you are nitpicking because I didn't put the 200 after the GF2MX?
Zuck Gou :)
01-15-02, 12:17 AM
I'm referring to you saying that the Apollo is faster than a GF2-MX, when your giving a link to it vs a GF2mx-200.
I'd hardly call the difference between an MX and an MX-200 nitpicking. It is a huge difference.
The Apollo IS faster than an MX-200(which is junk), while the Gf2mx and mx-400 are much faster.
Whatever, I forgot to put the 200 after mx.
I fixed it :D
Zuck Gou :)
01-15-02, 01:16 AM
:D
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.