Rich'[ard]
12-01-08, 09:37 PM
as the title states, i'm having a huge problem with my new 750GB WD i bought yesterday.
i installed Vista on it, anticipating it to be a lot faster than my old Seagate 250GB. but infact, it is much slower than my Seagate (HD Tune benchmark).
my start up times have increased from 40 secs to 60 secs, and i can no longer start doing stuff as soon as the desktop appears. even my G15 takes 20 seconds before the LCD and G keys work.
i have partitioned the 750 into 40GB (windows) and 660GB - 50GB got cut off). i have also defragged it with AusLogics Disk Defrag after i installed all my programs, yet it is still a lot slower than my Seagate.
HD Tune Benchmarks:
Seagate 250gb
http://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn109/Rich_huang70/Seagate.jpg
WD 750gb
http://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn109/Rich_huang70/WD.jpg
both are 7200rpm, 16mb cache.
any help would be great, becuase if this is unusual, i want to send it back as soon as possible.
thanks.
EDIT: if this can help, my Seagate has probably been formatted 10 times (10 Windows installs) while my WD is fresh.
i remember when i was running XP about a year ago, my Seagate hdd's benchmark was similar to the WD - all over the place and jumpy. but now it's very good. does a hdd need some type of burn-in process like TIM does?
i installed Vista on it, anticipating it to be a lot faster than my old Seagate 250GB. but infact, it is much slower than my Seagate (HD Tune benchmark).
my start up times have increased from 40 secs to 60 secs, and i can no longer start doing stuff as soon as the desktop appears. even my G15 takes 20 seconds before the LCD and G keys work.
i have partitioned the 750 into 40GB (windows) and 660GB - 50GB got cut off). i have also defragged it with AusLogics Disk Defrag after i installed all my programs, yet it is still a lot slower than my Seagate.
HD Tune Benchmarks:
Seagate 250gb
http://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn109/Rich_huang70/Seagate.jpg
WD 750gb
http://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn109/Rich_huang70/WD.jpg
both are 7200rpm, 16mb cache.
any help would be great, becuase if this is unusual, i want to send it back as soon as possible.
thanks.
EDIT: if this can help, my Seagate has probably been formatted 10 times (10 Windows installs) while my WD is fresh.
i remember when i was running XP about a year ago, my Seagate hdd's benchmark was similar to the WD - all over the place and jumpy. but now it's very good. does a hdd need some type of burn-in process like TIM does?