I've been surveying the DDR3 market, and I'm finding that the cost to own memory goes up pretty fast after DDR3-1600, with the jump to 1866 costing almost 70$.
OCZ Platinum, 7-7-7-24, DDR3-1600 119.99
OCZ Reaper, 9-9-9-28, DDR3-1866 190.99
A review I read on memory in general had shown that timings and frequencies are almost equivalent in terms of performance gain. I'd assume that the timings of the DDR3-1600 would more than make up for the frequency bump of the OCZ reaper, and personally, I'd rather have the more standard RAM heatsink for better CPU heatsink compatibility.
But I've also read that DDR3-2000 kits with good timings can outpace DDR3-1600. So this leaves me wondering, since I can't really find a good round up, I wonder what you all think. Is the lower tmings and slightly lower frequency better?
I suppose I'm going to go read on the i7 overclocking methodology so I can figure out how this will more accurately impact overclocking friendliness.
OCZ Platinum, 7-7-7-24, DDR3-1600 119.99
OCZ Reaper, 9-9-9-28, DDR3-1866 190.99
A review I read on memory in general had shown that timings and frequencies are almost equivalent in terms of performance gain. I'd assume that the timings of the DDR3-1600 would more than make up for the frequency bump of the OCZ reaper, and personally, I'd rather have the more standard RAM heatsink for better CPU heatsink compatibility.
But I've also read that DDR3-2000 kits with good timings can outpace DDR3-1600. So this leaves me wondering, since I can't really find a good round up, I wonder what you all think. Is the lower tmings and slightly lower frequency better?
I suppose I'm going to go read on the i7 overclocking methodology so I can figure out how this will more accurately impact overclocking friendliness.