• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

using more than 4 gig in xp

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

bwanaaa

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2003
i dont how many of you will find this useful, but i 'found' a way to use all the ram in my xp system. As you know, xp limits the ram to 4 gig minus the amount that the graphics card requires ~ so about 3.25 gig is available to the OS. However, if you have ram disk plus installed, you can assign it to use that unrecognized ram. for example, i put 8 gig into my xp box and created a ram disk out of the ram that xp cannot use.

what to do with it?

well, i put internet explorer and firefox cache files there. photoshop scratch files. whatever normally goes to a slow hd can now be accessed super fast.

forgive me if this is not the right place to post his.
 
i dont how many of you will find this useful, but i 'found' a way to use all the ram in my xp system. As you know, xp limits the ram to 4 gig minus the amount that the graphics card requires ~ so about 3.25 gig is available to the OS. However, if you have ram disk plus installed, you can assign it to use that unrecognized ram. for example, i put 8 gig into my xp box and created a ram disk out of the ram that xp cannot use.

what to do with it?

well, i put internet explorer and firefox cache files there. photoshop scratch files. whatever normally goes to a slow hd can now be accessed super fast.

forgive me if this is not the right place to post his.

i think it will be kind of dumb using 8gb of ram on a 32bit os.. just install 64 bit :)
 
i dont how many of you will find this useful, but i 'found' a way to use all the ram in my xp system. As you know, xp limits the ram to 4 gig minus the amount that the graphics card requires ~ so about 3.25 gig is available to the OS. However, if you have ram disk plus installed, you can assign it to use that unrecognized ram. for example, i put 8 gig into my xp box and created a ram disk out of the ram that xp cannot use.

what to do with it?

well, i put internet explorer and firefox cache files there. photoshop scratch files. whatever normally goes to a slow hd can now be accessed super fast.

forgive me if this is not the right place to post his.

Very nice something to consider especially with many people using 32 bit OSes to help overclock further :)
 
well you could always do the PAE switch but that will only get you up to 4gigs of system ram. i did what he is suggesting on my IP35-pro with XP-SP3/32bit and 4gigs of ram. though i mainly did it for temp files from IE/FF,ect...
 
well you could always do the PAE switch but that will only get you up to 4gigs of system ram.

Without PAE there is access to 4GB address space, which is maximum for 32bit XP. So PAE will not help. XP/SP2 runs in PAE mode by default anyways.
 
How is something like that possible? I don't see it working since 32bit OS can only address 3.25Gb of memory
 
I also use ramdisk plus since few months, for TEMP and for PageFile. No problems. Some things are in Vista64 much slower than in XP32.
 
How is something like that possible? I don't see it working since 32bit OS can only address 3.25Gb of memory

32bit OSs can address (2^32)B or 4GB of RAM.

VRAM is just addressed first, then your RAM. So, 4096MB - VRAM = Total Possible System RAM.
 
The ram disk product mentioned here goes beyond the Windows memory manager, so it can use ram above 4GB.
 
i dont how many of you will find this useful, but i 'found' a way to use all the ram in my xp system. As you know, xp limits the ram to 4 gig minus the amount that the graphics card requires ~ so about 3.25 gig is available to the OS. However, if you have ram disk plus installed, you can assign it to use that unrecognized ram. for example, i put 8 gig into my xp box and created a ram disk out of the ram that xp cannot use.

what to do with it?

well, i put internet explorer and firefox cache files there. photoshop scratch files. whatever normally goes to a slow hd can now be accessed super fast.

forgive me if this is not the right place to post his.

So... what kind of speed increase are we talking about? ........what about benchmarking? cant see any increase there...... still. That brings me back to my problem I only have two gigs of reaper and I am gonna upgrade while the prices are low. So which is better 4 gigs of Mushkin Accent 1600 @ 7 7 6 18 or 8gigs of gskill 1600 @ 9 9 9 24? Will be 64 bit when windows 7 is released ( have 64 beta/XP dual booted now) The prices are about the same. Mushkin seems like it is way better memory but still double the ram for the same price.... Help me out what do you guys think? I will repost with my specs
 
Way too much fuss is made over OS limitations. The motherboard doesn't care which OS you are using or how memory the OS sees. If the motherboard can run 4 gigs, it will run 4 gigs and the OS will use as much of it as it can.
 
Back