mrbobc
04-20-09, 11:36 AM
ive just been checking out some stats as i'm getting an exchange for my 4850x2 and i was looking at a 4870x2 or 2x 4870s in crossfire. but i was checking out the graphics cards charts at tomshardware and it seems that, overall, 2x 4870 512mb cards is really not far enough off the 4870x2 2gb card to warrant the price difference. in all theres only 6fps difference at maximum detail with 1900/1200 res and full aa/af in a total of 8 games including crysis, world in conflict and fsx.
in some games the 2 4870s in crossfire got slightly better frames at that res! so whats the diddlyo?
can anyone confirm or deny these finding.
the problem is that i can get 2 4870s 512mb for £260, but the 4870x2 comes in at £330. thats a £70 difference for what seems a minimal gain at such a high resolution so like i said, can anyone prove otherwise to these findings or is it more down to the raw power of 2 gpu's than the memory buffer???
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/charts/gaming-graphics-charts-q3-2008/Sum-of-FPS-Benchmarks-1920x1200-AA,801.html
in some games the 2 4870s in crossfire got slightly better frames at that res! so whats the diddlyo?
can anyone confirm or deny these finding.
the problem is that i can get 2 4870s 512mb for £260, but the 4870x2 comes in at £330. thats a £70 difference for what seems a minimal gain at such a high resolution so like i said, can anyone prove otherwise to these findings or is it more down to the raw power of 2 gpu's than the memory buffer???
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/charts/gaming-graphics-charts-q3-2008/Sum-of-FPS-Benchmarks-1920x1200-AA,801.html