View Full Version : What OS would u recommed to me?
MoPMatrix
01-23-02, 03:47 PM
I'm usin 98se right now, and if I'm d/lin alot of files over night, or burning a cd. When I come back to the comp its all slow and like takes a while to get back up too speed. And I mean really slow, if u minamize a window it like slides away insead of jumpin down into the start menu, things take forever to load.
I was thinkin it had something to do with 98se's bad mem mangament...
And I'm gettin a new HD soon, And 98se just dosen't seem to be able to cut it anymore so I was wondering what OS I should give a shot.
Everyone says XP and 2000 are really stable and has better mem mangament then the 9x versions, and u can leave em running for months at a time :P
That ain't happeing with 98
But also XP has some compatability problems with older hardware/software, just wondering if it's worth it...
Or should I wait till the service pack comes out?
The main reson I wana get rid of 98se is cuz the slow downs and the instability...
Also u can use more then 512megs of ram in XP :P
Could use the extra sicks I got sittin around.
pritty much all I do is d/l, burn cd's and play ALOT of Descent 3
So what u guys recommed
stick with 98se,
XP
or
win2k
RainMaQer
01-23-02, 04:15 PM
I, personally, just went from 98se to XP pro Corporate (same as pro just no activation) and I love it. I still want to see what all the hype is about with win2k... but so far it works great... as far as compatability... i'm using a sound blaster 16 value ISA sound card and it works fine... no problems... just sounds like **** :p
Seeing you have very good system specs I'd go with Windows XP Pro.
It is very good especially if you have a good rig.
After a good tweak too it'll run fast.
Yodums
rogerdugans
01-23-02, 05:12 PM
I suggest 2000, I have run all the MS operating systems since Win 3.0 (except ME) and Win2K is the best of the bunch: all the speed and stability of NT, plug and play and compatibility from 9x, and a lot less bloat and resource hogging than XP. IMO.
Jeff Bolton
01-23-02, 05:30 PM
Originally posted by rogerdugans
I suggest 2000, I have run all the MS operating systems since Win 3.0 (except ME) and Win2K is the best of the bunch: all the speed and stability of NT, plug and play and compatibility from 9x, and a lot less bloat and resource hogging than XP. IMO.
nuff said. i agree with rogerdugans and say you should go with 2000. :)
jeff
Well my vote goes for XP Pro Corp. its fast and stable like 2k and i didnt notice any resource hogging...of course both 2k and XP need proper tweaking ;)
MoPMatrix
01-23-02, 07:17 PM
Well I'm sure disabling all those services will be the first thing I do :P
I like Nothing running with my comp, like right now Msconfig has like 3 things in it, when u hit alt-ctrl-del all u see is exploer and system tray, and theres 0 icons in system tray :P
BTW: does anyone know when the first service pack for XP will be out?
MoPMatrix
01-23-02, 07:25 PM
I ran the XP compatbility checker at the MS site just now, it found a few things :P
but I think it's just cuz there not usin XP drivers...
These are all the things it said wouldn't work in XP....
Display adapters
3dfx Voodoo Series (Voodoo 5 5500)
-I know I can get drivers for this...
Printer
Hewlett-Packard DeskJet 930C
Sound, video and game controllers
CMI8738/C3DX PCI Audio Device (Onboard C-Media Sound)
Logitech Gaming Devices
-Can get XP drivers for this too...
Universal Serial Bus controllers
ImageMate CompactFlash Drive (Digi cam card reader)
-Dunno about this...
3dfx Tools (in Control Panel) (Vid card Control Pannel)
System Information (in Control Panel)
SiSoft Sandra 2001te Standard (Duh) :P
DirectCD 3
DVD Movie Player
Windows 2000 Professional all the way.
Its more stable, has better compatability, and less stuff to take up your valuable resourses than XP.
XprincoX
01-24-02, 01:53 AM
Well each OS has there pros and cons... just depends on what u do and personal preference i guess... winXP here!! :D
Well..this may turn into "debate"..:eek:
nuciles
01-24-02, 05:29 AM
Let's get a vote!!!
I will vote for 2000!!!
Maddman
01-24-02, 05:52 AM
If you were running win2k and happy with it I wouldn't upgrade to winxp. if on the otherhand you have to buy an OS anyway I recomend winxp. One of my freinds got a copy from one of his enployers and didn't need it so gave it to me and I have been running it for 2 months with no more problems then I had on win2k.
Let's get a vote!!!
OK...one for XP Pro Corp...
Tumbler 00
01-24-02, 04:51 PM
My question would be, are either one having game compatability problems? I know win2k did a while back.
I just installed XP Pro and have one software compatibility problem (minor). However, I have managed to crash the program completely (auto reboot or blue screen with the feature turned off, no startup items, sitting at desktop), not hardware conflict. I have some old components might have been that. Plus XP need lots of tweaking to run at a acceptable spped. I am going back to win2K Pro.
lonewolf1983
01-24-02, 10:35 PM
win2k pro i have found to be the best
XP gave me alot of problems
and for me its too new an OS for my liking
as for uptimes, week and a half atm on win2k pro
topped out at a month previously
win2k claims memory back as if it was going out of fashion
and should have no problems with drivers
Wicked Klown
01-25-02, 02:26 PM
I'd say go with Windows XP. So far the only problem I had i a game would not install not a big thing tho. So far in every benchmark I have ran I've gaid more points. With 3Dmark2001 I was able to get almost 600 more points.
DECODER22
01-26-02, 01:15 AM
HEHE I SAY WIN2K ADV SERVER ROCKS
Pdwight
01-26-02, 02:44 AM
I just did the upgrade to XP Pro from WIn2K Pro, personally I think its slower. I cant get Wolfenstien to run. It says missing glide ?? something. I can find original VooDoo5 Drivers for XP? XP reports that I only have 32 meg of ram on the card ! its a 64 meg ram AGP card. I am running a SOYO Dragon plus with 256 meg 2700 DDR. I probbly will go back to win2K this weekend. Too many problems, I had to disable my external cache in my bios to get it to run , this slows down my sustem. I Duno you guys have any input ??
THX
Dwight P:eh?:
love xp, now trying linux
MoPMatrix
01-26-02, 03:06 AM
Originally posted by Pdwight
I just did the upgrade to XP Pro from WIn2K Pro, personally I think its slower. I cant get Wolfenstien to run. It says missing glide ?? something. I can find original VooDoo5 Drivers for XP? XP reports that I only have 32 meg of ram on the card ! its a 64 meg ram AGP card. I am running a SOYO Dragon plus with 256 meg 2700 DDR. I probbly will go back to win2K this weekend. Too many problems, I had to disable my external cache in my bios to get it to run , this slows down my sustem. I Duno you guys have any input ??
THX
Dwight P:eh?:
Get the voodoo 5 - XP Drivers here (http://nat.mine.nu:81/3dfx/)
It'll solve all ur problems =)
MadMan007
01-26-02, 07:28 AM
Consider this: now that XP is the newest "mainstream" OS a lot of companies will be focusing their software and driver development toward XP first and 2k second.
Just my $.02
rogerdugans
01-26-02, 11:03 AM
Originally posted by MadMan007
Consider this: now that XP is the newest "mainstream" OS a lot of companies will be focusing their software and driver development toward XP first and 2k second.
Just my $.02
A good point!
Although XP is not an upgrade from Win2K, merely a version of the os intended more for basic users (Win2K is keeping the business/IT category), most people think it is, so most software developers will concentrate more on that. Fortunately for IT and Win2K the differences are few, so Win2K will get 99% of the stuff XP does.
From what I can discern of MS's current releases/strategy XP is to reside in the Home and Small Business arena and Win2K is intended for large businesses, heavy-duty networking and server fields, the crossover area being mostly in medium-sized networks.
and That is My $.02.:D
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.