CPUmark99

[tainice]

it just strikes me that why nobody in there using cpumark99? I used to use that little thing to test how my puter doing, it seems like Sandra has replaced it (and many others program)...:( it is not a bad thing, i just simply miss it. hey people, post your cpumark99 score!! i need to know!! and dying to know!!:D specially those who hits high fsb, please!

[deez]

tainice...haha i used to use it too thanks for the reminder

P3 1100E@1308 score= 108

If I remember right the cele 500@600 used to get 42

[tainice]

more and more!!

PIII 85? = 78, Celeron 425 = 42(? don't remember exact)

by the way deez, i cannot find the program anywhere, please tell me where i can download it or somebody posts it, thanks.:)

[deez]

just downloaded it again attaching to this post

[res0r9lm]

1.4 t bird= 115

[Kendan]

The rig in my sig got a 132 with F@H2 running.

[pappypete]

Plll S = 141

[nodoze]

This is funny - PIII 450 (my "fast" work computer") = 34.7:rolleyes:

[tainice]

nodoze, how can this be!! there must be something that is hindering your chip! i think motherboard has to do with it..what kind of MB you are currently hosting your chip on? to be honest, my 300a@412 (36~38)mhz will beat your score everytime, so do something!!:eek:

[nodoze]

My work computer was purchased/setup by our IT department & since it's not really my property I'm just using it as is. The purchasers of our equipment are known for putting $ before performance so that score didn't surprise me at all.

But here's another one... My Home computer (Pentium Pro 200) = 14.7:( I can remember when this machine was a real screamer & even though it's a dog by today's standards, it still meets most of my needs.

[Silver]

T-bird 1.4 @ 1.72= 158

[tainice]

nodoze:

hehehe, that'z cool, as long as you are satisfy, then it is ok, how fast the rig does not really matter!! for example, i am using my rig, check below, which is really slow comparing to others in this forum, BUT it does the job, a wonderful job actually, and i am very happy with it!! so i don't think i will set up my Piii tualatin 1.26 soon (the chip and mobo just lay there doing nothing), cuz there is no need!!

[Silver]

Originally posted by tainice
it just strikes me that why nobody in there using cpumark99? I used to use that little thing to test how my puter doing, it seems like Sandra has replaced it (and many others program)...:( it is not a bad thing, i just simply miss it. hey people, post your cpumark99 score!! i need to know!! and dying to know!!:D specially those who hits high fsb, please!

I'm sorry, it was my understanding that you were asking for this information.

[tainice]

silver:

yes and yes!! i asked for it:) actually, i just missed it, you know, nowaday nobody seems to include cpumark99 as one of their main bench test, and i miss it very much.:) when i first started to oc, i used to run it like every 5 min or so just to check how my rig doing.. anyway, thanks for sharing your score with us, appricated

[ol' man]

cel-t @ 1.6GHz 133fsb----134 pts'

[Silver]

I understand that. During the years I have seen many programs that I liked (or was at least used to) go by the wayside and it is hard to relate old scores to new programs.:)

[jazztrumpet216]

P4 1.8 = 105 :(

[John1975]

celeron 850@ 1.13 133fsb............cpumark 75.2

I guess I see a 1.2 Celeron in my future

[DodjY]

Celeron 850 @ 1133 = 80.5

"first post"

most interesting message board i've visited :D

[Flu!d]

CPU mark 99 specs as per sig: 122 CPU marks.

Does it help if you peform it from a clean boot with minimal programs running in the background?

[oldfart]

PIII-S @ 1.44 GHz = 134

[soil]

111 spec as sig

[soil]

Originally posted by Flu!d
CPU mark 99 specs as per sig: 122 CPU marks.

Does it help if you peform it from a clean boot with minimal programs running in the background?

some said yea, but mine is run under normal TSR

ummm...the CPUmark of 1.5G Tualeron is lower than 1.44G PIII-S, because of the cache or the FSB?:rolleyes:

[tainice]

a clean boot with min background prog. will help your score for certain according to my own personal experience:) back then, i checked the score like everything 8 min or so...:D so trust me.. you score with change like 5+-.

[6502kid]

Celly-T 1.1a @ 1505 -- 111

[oldfart]

ummm...the CPUmark of 1.5G Tualeron is lower than 1.44G PIII-S, because of the cache or the FSB?
Good question.

[stompah]

System #1 in my sig got 54.6 with a bunch of programs running. I will try again later.

[tainice]

to solve the question is actually pretty simple, people who got P-s, lower your fsb and compare the score.

[BigRed]

p3 700e@933 = 89.3

[pappypete]

Plll S 1.26@133FSB 1.45CV=117

[tainice]

from the result of all your inputs, it seems that 512k is really doing its job!!

PIII:

1) Deez: 1100E @1308, 1.75vcore, scores 108 on ASUS TUSL-2C

2) Soil: 1000E @1342, 2.05vcore, scores 111 on Epox 3VCA2

Celeron-T:

1) 6502kid: 1.1a @ 1505, scores 111 on either XET-C or SY board.

2) Flu!d: 1.2a @ 1500, scores 122 on XET

3) Ol'man: 1.2a @ 1600, scores 133 on ST6(?)

P-s:

1) Oldfart: 1.26 @ 1.44, scores 134 on XET-C

2) Pappypete: 1.26 @ 1.26, scores 117 on XET-C
1.26 @ 1.52, scores 141 on XET-C


Please notes that 1.1a scores the lowest score despite high fsb, reason unknown tho. people with 1.1a, please post your score, so we can see if this is just an accident or something else.

-

[funnyperson1]

PIII600@852= 77.2

[pappypete]

Don't know how important it is, other than increase in
FSB= better score.

PlllS @ 170FSB=148

[TC]

P4 2.2@2.81GHz = 173

[Yodums]

Originally posted by TC
P4 2.2@2.81GHz = 173

Wow...

[TC]

Originally posted by Yodums


Wow... Is that really good? I've never used this program before....

[tainice]

considering i am still at 78, then you will know how good your score looks:) but...P-s at 1.65g scores 148...

[soil]

Originally posted by pappypete
Plll S 1.26@133FSB 1.45CV=117

"Celly-T 1.1a @ 1505 -- 111"

so more cache would help CPUmark even with lower FSB?

[pappypete]

Heh.....@175FSB and a groan....151

[Malakai]

system in sig:124 with a couple of proggies running in the background. not o/c'ed(crap stepping)
*edit*
oops, intel section sorry:D

[deez]

Originally posted by Malakai
system in sig:124 with a couple of proggies running in the background. not o/c'ed(crap stepping)
*edit*
oops, intel section sorry:D

actually its nice to have an AMD comparison...it would be nice to have a few more to compare

[tainice]

yeah, i just love to see my ass get kicked...just kidding..:) anyway, my 1.26 will be up lastest friday, cannot wait...but have to finish all the tests first....damn thoese professors, giving out tests 7 days after the break....cry for humanity!

[Flu!d]

Fresh boot, no proggy's running in the background....125 CPU marks.

[oldfart]

I tested the Kids PC's

Celeron (CuMine) 1 G @ 1.12 GHz: 78.3
AMD K6-3+ 450: 37.2

[saytan]

celemine 800 @ 1152 = 86 or so

[Silver]

Tweaked the psu, raised the fsb a little and got:

T-bird 1.4@ 160

[Turbo]

P4 NW 1.8A @ 2.51 Ghz: 158

[Rio71]

P III 700
Chipsatz Intel 440BX ; 256MB Infineon PC 100 2-2-2 (2 x 128MB)
Laptop
:burn:

[takiwa]

for the 1.1a in the siggy...MBM 5 and Norton AV in the background

[Malakai]

got a new XP. not to bad, i got a 21pt. increase for an extra 200 mhz.
for the system in my sig:

[Rio71]

P III 700
Chipsatz Intel 440BX ; 256MB Infineon PC 100 2-2-2 (2 x 128MB)
Laptop :burn:

[Rio71]

...

[Rooski]

CPUMark99= 122

[muddocktor]

P3 1.26S@1711/180 fsb, DC project running while running benchmark.

[tainice]

P-s 1615, scores 164, 1.62v

ooooops..should be 146..hehe..:)

[Malakai]

Originally posted by muddocktor
P3 1.26S@1711/180 fsb, DC project running while running benchmark.
pIII's and athlon's seem to do about the same amount of work at similar clock speeds. anyone got a p4 at 1.6-1.7?
p.s.: muddocktor, thats a SWEET o/c. u definetely get recognition from me(500 mhz wow):D
-Malakai

[tainice]

yeah, muddocktor is doing an awsome job! give my two thumbs up. well, just a question to our respectable doc, what kinda f ram u are using?

[deez]

Celeron 1.0A@1333 = 115

Its a brand new chip...just breaking it in