elitesix
12-22-09, 04:25 AM
I recently read an old article (3xxx radeon series old - http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/pci-express-2.0,1915-9.html ) concerning pci-e 4x-16x lanes and gpu performance. I wanted to run a test to see how much pci-e overclocking affected modern gpu since it stands to reason modern gpus saturate the pci-e bus more than older cards.
Specification:
Graphics: EVGA 275 SLI @ 693/1585/2510 core/shader/memory
CPU: i7 920 @ 4.1 Ghz (195x21), L3 Cache @ 3.9 Ghz, HT off
Memory: 3gb Corsair DDR3-1333@ 1950 CAS 9
MB: Asus P6T (both cards on 16x pci-e 2.0 slots)
PSU: Corsair TX850w
Test Setup:
PCI-E 100 mhz versus 109 mhz (115 mhz froze during testing)
Windows 7 Build 7100
Company of Heroes 2.601
Nvidia Driver Version 191.07 (V-sync off, Prerendered frames 0, AFR2, 16xAF, Prefer Maximum Performance, High Quality)
Game Settings: 1600x1200, 16xAF, 16xAA Quality, All In game Settings Maxed
I ran three runs of the ingame, built in benchmarking tool. It was not until the third benchmark run on both runs did harddrive thrashing cease (though the second run had very little). It is also of note that the average fps increased between the 1st to 2nd runs, and slightly increased again between the 2nd to 3rd runs, so we're not dealing with natural variation / benchmarking error.
Results (third benchmark run, displayed in average/max/minimum fps):
PCI-E 100mhz: 148.7/279/44
PCI-E 109mhz: 151.5/288/47
Percent Difference 100 versus 109:
Average FPS Increase 1.8%
Maximum FPS Increase 3.2%
Minimum FPS Increase 6.8%
Interesting results. I ask anyone with even more powerful cards (Especially ATI 58xx or 5970s) post their experiences with PCI-E overclocking and specifically, any test results.
-elitesix
EDIT: Although 115 mhz wouldn't work, I reran the test at 114mhz and got the following results average/max/min:
PCI-E 114mhz: 150.2/292/50
Specification:
Graphics: EVGA 275 SLI @ 693/1585/2510 core/shader/memory
CPU: i7 920 @ 4.1 Ghz (195x21), L3 Cache @ 3.9 Ghz, HT off
Memory: 3gb Corsair DDR3-1333@ 1950 CAS 9
MB: Asus P6T (both cards on 16x pci-e 2.0 slots)
PSU: Corsair TX850w
Test Setup:
PCI-E 100 mhz versus 109 mhz (115 mhz froze during testing)
Windows 7 Build 7100
Company of Heroes 2.601
Nvidia Driver Version 191.07 (V-sync off, Prerendered frames 0, AFR2, 16xAF, Prefer Maximum Performance, High Quality)
Game Settings: 1600x1200, 16xAF, 16xAA Quality, All In game Settings Maxed
I ran three runs of the ingame, built in benchmarking tool. It was not until the third benchmark run on both runs did harddrive thrashing cease (though the second run had very little). It is also of note that the average fps increased between the 1st to 2nd runs, and slightly increased again between the 2nd to 3rd runs, so we're not dealing with natural variation / benchmarking error.
Results (third benchmark run, displayed in average/max/minimum fps):
PCI-E 100mhz: 148.7/279/44
PCI-E 109mhz: 151.5/288/47
Percent Difference 100 versus 109:
Average FPS Increase 1.8%
Maximum FPS Increase 3.2%
Minimum FPS Increase 6.8%
Interesting results. I ask anyone with even more powerful cards (Especially ATI 58xx or 5970s) post their experiences with PCI-E overclocking and specifically, any test results.
-elitesix
EDIT: Although 115 mhz wouldn't work, I reran the test at 114mhz and got the following results average/max/min:
PCI-E 114mhz: 150.2/292/50