Windows XP Sucks !!! Or tell me....

[^^^Floorkiller^^^]

I have had so many bugs and problems , that i cannot tell on my fingerscale...

Xp may be a good OS , but " WHEN " ??

I don´t feel the need for telling u the prob , but they are there and they are MANY....


Tell me I´m NOT the ONLY one..... : (

/ Mike

[Yodums]

Works for me.

Did you do a clean install or an upgrade install? Everyone here had it at least working!

Yodums

[bdf24]

Run's bug free for me as well. Sorry!
Just a little little sluggish with only 256megs of ram.

[XprincoX]

yup also runs smooth as a hot knife thru butter on all my systems. :D

[phungilax]

I plan on upgrading to XP shortly once i get some more ram. All the peoiple that i have talked to say its bug free. it only gives them problems if they attempt to dual boot it. but even that can be accomplished with a little work

[Maddman]

I have it on three systems here and it runs smouth on only 256 megs of ram.

[Wicked Klown]

Smooth as silk for me and with only 256m.b. of ram. I did a clean install. My brother-in-law did an upgrade from Windows ME and he had to uninstall Xp cause it kept freezing on him. Also my step-father did the upgrade from ME and now due to a mistake has to download everything all over again.

[JAWS]

Originally posted by Maddman
I have it on three systems here and it runs smouth on only 256 megs of ram.

I also have 256 megs of ram, and it's stable as a rock. :) I will soon be running 512 ddr. :)

[xCarne_Asada]

XP is great on my comp.

[MrOOBiLL]

I got bugs, lots o bugs! muhahaha! i dont really care that much though, its better than 98 any day.

[David]

XP is fantastic - had very few problems. Beats 9x any day.

[Dug]

Lots of bugs. Atleast 1 to 2 BSOD (auto reboots a day). Back to Win2k for me.

[SickBoy]

I have XP on 2 systems - one Duron@700/256 MB PC133 and one TBird@1000/512 MB PC2100.

When I upgraded the TBird box to 512 I didn't notice any difference in how smooth/fast things ran. The Duron box runs almost as smooth with only 256 MB. I think the difference is CPU related, most likely.

[DeltaSierra]

Nothing but trouble for me. Random crashes, undecipherable error messages and worst of all, nearly impossible to uninstall. I finally formatted the hard drive and started over with W2K.

[Tebore]

I really woundn't know how good it is, it froze up twice during the install and what have you. I reformatted again and reinstalled ME. ME does what i need to IMO best OS i've ever used. as stable as W2K in my opinion and has the extra safety of system Restorer. Ask my friends they would agree.

[mdcomp]

XP is awesome!!! I have been running it ever since the first day it came out. No problems at all. I have 384mb SDRAM and an Athlon 900. Clean Install with the great NTFS file system. Ntfs is more secure try using it instead of Fat32.

[Zuck Gou :)]

Originally posted by mdcomp
XP is awesome!!! I have been running it ever since the first day it came out. No problems at all. I have 384mb SDRAM and an Athlon 900. Clean Install with the great NTFS file system. Ntfs is more secure try using it instead of Fat32.

:o , and there's a pengiun in your avatar!

:D

[Malakai]

XP works great for me.a few minor bugs, but its better for games than 2000, wich i used to have. and i cant even compare to 98.
the only BSOD's came from pushing my old tbird too hard.
I give it 2 thumbs up!

[rogerdugans]

I give XP 3 thumbs down! But I've got a Toshiba laptop OEM install, and only 256mb of ram.

Would probably be better with a standard installation. It is SLOW.

As an experiment I tossed 2000 pro on it and there was quite an improvement!!!

I'm starting to think that XP might be like ME in at least one way: Those who do not have problems have ABSOLUTELY no problems, but those that do.......hate it with a passion!

As it matures I am sure it will get better, as MS oses always do, but I still find it amazing that MS took such a giant step backwards- and using the same kernel! The stuff that screws XP up is just the bloat that is added on to 2K. My opinion.