View Full Version : Water Cooling the 400's (Question)
JDawggS316
04-08-10, 12:17 PM
Would water cooling the GTX 470 or GTX 480 cut down on power consumption as well as heat?
If so would it be by much?
ezikiel12
04-08-10, 02:19 PM
It would cut down on heat for sure. The only power it would save is from the fan. If you dont already have a pump for a water cooling setup then I would say it probably wouldn't save any power..
Bobnova
04-08-10, 02:42 PM
Nope, it won't cut down on heat either.
Any cooling system simply moves the heat, the same amount of heat still exists.
The card will be cooler, but that 250-400w of heat is still going into the room.
Power consumption may go down on the card due to no 1.8 amp fan, but pumps draw quite a bit of power also.
Power consumption MIGHT go down a little, but 10% is already a lot. It depends on how much cooler the card is with the new cooling.
The warmer a chip gets, the more leackage will happen. This is, btw. the reason intel integrated the vDroop. Not many people know, though.
HT4U did a test on this last year. They got a 22W difference on a GTX 280 between 60 and 85 °C
http://ht4u.net/reviews/2009/power_consumption_graphics/index9.php
mrgettmann
04-08-10, 07:34 PM
Would water cooling the GTX 470 or GTX 480 cut down on power consumption as well as heat?
If so would it be by much?
For the 480:
http://www.koolance.com/water-cooling/product_info.php?product_id=1017
For the 470:
http://www.koolance.com/water-cooling/product_info.php?product_id=1016
jason4207
04-08-10, 07:53 PM
Power consumption MIGHT go down a little, but 10% is already a lot. It depends on how much cooler the card is with the new cooling.
The warmer a chip gets, the more leackage will happen. This is, btw. the reason intel integrated the vDroop. Not many people know, though.
HT4U did a test on this last year. They got a 22W difference on a GTX 280 between 60 and 85 °C
http://ht4u.net/reviews/2009/power_consumption_graphics/index9.php
So, then the voltage spikes going from idle to load have nothing to do w/ Intel's vdroop implementation? If so, that just adds to my argument that there is absolutely nothing wrong w/ using LLC to aid in OCing.
Great post btw!
Bobnova
04-08-10, 08:15 PM
Intel integrated vdrop, not vdroop. That's how i understand it, at least.
jason4207
04-08-10, 09:21 PM
Vdrop is just the difference between the voltage you see in the BIOS (which is just a label) and what shows up in CPU-Z. I don't see how that fits.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.