I dont get this hatred for the reserator.
I agree you can buy your own kit and make it up - fare enough - it will more than likely perform ten times better.
What is wrong with buying an item that works for 80% of your workload, and then improve it in areas where needed - surely thats half the fun of modding?
I bought the reserator because lots of people told me it wouldn't work even for the CPU alone, I have prooved today that for my usual day to day work it coped well enough with the CPU and GPU, although it wouldnt work at full load for an hour constantly. I never run my system at full load for that long.
I now want to add a 2nd radiator to help give the system a little extra headroom.
I have asked a question about wether there is any way of working out what size radiator would be better, and I have been told that the reserator is poo. As for the galvanization, the system comes with fluid to prevent this:
http://www.quietpc.com/gb-en-gbp/products/watercooling/zm-g200
As a further point, I have had the system off for a few hours while I have been out for a curry, came home, switched on, system is currently running at 24c, with the GPU at 17c - no real load on the CPU, but it is running iTunes, Outlook and FireFox which is what the system is used for quite a lot of the time.
So back to my original question which EarthDog has helped with (Thank You) - is there any science behind choosing the right size radiator, or is it a case of just going for something big?
I mentioned the RZ120 following this review at Skinee Labs:
http://skinneelabs.com/xspc-rx120.html
If I am reading the review correctly, it is showing just over 100w heat dissipation using a Yate Loon D12SM12 at 500rpm, so using a Gentle Typhoon at similar speeds should give me a similar, if slightly lower result.
Should an extra 100w heat disipation (effectively a third of the reserator) be enough to lower temps an extra 10c?