just jump back to the Reviews (anywhere not just there) to see WHY the chances are a specific item was sent back.
A) they all are buggy/failing/flawed
B) to complex and users couldnt handle them, or missed one point that could be critical to operation.
C) Doesnt FIT half the stuff they tried it on
D) didnt have a feature some users found critical, will you?
E) incorrect applicaison, like putting a 300W GPU on a 400W machine
F) going back for "refurb" to much
G) is there a new "revision" that the history shows a big flaw in the old model
H) easily damaged in shipping, but is it in the area that you care about?
I) LCD screen with One widdle bad pixel, and user freaks out and sends it back for the one with 4 Dead pixels
J) and the list continues . . .
you gotta know if its a failure and they just dont test it well enough to find that specific failure. how many times do people send stuff back, and they know it fails, but it will be re-tagged and re-bagged because on simple testing it doesnt.
How many times have you seen stuff go back, but it had little to nothing to do with a failure of the product.
If you go to (say) amason, and it rates a 2 star, and the problems and Reasons people had problems with it will effect you the same way, then is it a deal?
if you go to e-pinions and you see that everyone who couldnt operate or install it doesnt know how to do that (and it shows) , then it could be a deal.
.