- Joined
- Jun 6, 2002
http://hothardware.com/News/Uncertainties-Abound-Intel-AMD-May-Both-Delay-NextGeneration-CPUs/
this does not seem to bold well for us, there is always a demand for new cpus. for intel pushing back wont hurt them as much but going to 22nm means more cpus per wafer. even if they stuck with 22nm for the next yr or longer. for amd if they push back it could hurt them more then help. since amd is pushing more real cores then adding in there version of HT like intel has.
HT does alot of good for cpus, increases work per watt and per clock. while fake cores never replaces real ones, HT ensures that the pipe is being constantly filled. that way you make the most out of each core on the cpu.
i just hope this doesn't happen...
this does not seem to bold well for us, there is always a demand for new cpus. for intel pushing back wont hurt them as much but going to 22nm means more cpus per wafer. even if they stuck with 22nm for the next yr or longer. for amd if they push back it could hurt them more then help. since amd is pushing more real cores then adding in there version of HT like intel has.
HT does alot of good for cpus, increases work per watt and per clock. while fake cores never replaces real ones, HT ensures that the pipe is being constantly filled. that way you make the most out of each core on the cpu.
i just hope this doesn't happen...