TUV4X & Celeron 1.1A (Tualation core).
Tested with 1003,1004.5,1004b.7
It seems to me that TUV4X doesn't support 1/4 pci divider for 133fsb.
Or 1/4 pci divider is intentionally blocked by ASUStek to make it hard or impossible to overclock 100fsb celerons.
I haven't been able to boot up my Celeron 1.1A with 125~133FSB.
Today it suddenly booted up and win2k started well for several times. But with my lan card (Netgear) disabled.
I ran sandra 2001se professional, Mainboard Information.
It said AGP clock was somewhere around 89mhz, PCI clock was over 44mhz and ** PCI divider was 1/3x **
This explains why my lan card was messed up.
I want to show you some evidence, but my system doesn't boot with 125~133fsb again. I can't get any screenshot. As soon as possible, I will post a screenshot.
I want to know how it's working for others with tuv4x and tual-celeron.
Even if it seems running well with 125~133FSB presently,
I strongly recommend that you check the PCI clock with sandra.
Tested with 1003,1004.5,1004b.7
It seems to me that TUV4X doesn't support 1/4 pci divider for 133fsb.
Or 1/4 pci divider is intentionally blocked by ASUStek to make it hard or impossible to overclock 100fsb celerons.
I haven't been able to boot up my Celeron 1.1A with 125~133FSB.
Today it suddenly booted up and win2k started well for several times. But with my lan card (Netgear) disabled.
I ran sandra 2001se professional, Mainboard Information.
It said AGP clock was somewhere around 89mhz, PCI clock was over 44mhz and ** PCI divider was 1/3x **
This explains why my lan card was messed up.
I want to show you some evidence, but my system doesn't boot with 125~133fsb again. I can't get any screenshot. As soon as possible, I will post a screenshot.
I want to know how it's working for others with tuv4x and tual-celeron.
Even if it seems running well with 125~133FSB presently,
I strongly recommend that you check the PCI clock with sandra.