gone_fishin said:
Specs for ICS 9212-03
http://www.icst.com/products/pdf/9212-03.pdf
Specs for ICS 9212-13
http://www.icst.com/products/pdf/9212-13.pdf
The only listed difference is that the -13 has more bypass and test mode selections period, the only difference.
In looking at these specs, I did notice one other difference, but I have no idea what it means. Under "Features" on the first pages and in the chart on the fourth pages it lists "Cycle to cycle jitter is less than 50ps" for the -03's and "less than 60ps" for the -13's. What does this mean? Is it anything that might account for a difference in performance?
The reason I ask is that there is an article today over at Hot Hardware called
"Getting PC1066 Level Performance From PC800 RDRAM & PC800 Motherboards - A modification project on the Abit TH7II-RAID" where they replaced the stock ICS -03 DRCG's with TI's rated for 533MHz. Here is the link:
http://www.hothardware.com/hh_files/Motherboards/abitth7iidrcg.shtml
A couple of things bumped me about the article, but this is so not my area of expertise, so maybe someone can help me out. In the article it says:
"With a 133MHz FSB and a 4X multiplier, you'll be hitting 533MHz SDR and 1.066GHz DDR on the RDRAM clocks. However, there is a good possibility you'll need an unlocked Pentium 4 for that because, there are very few chips with standard air cooling, that will hit a 33% overclock, with the exception of the 1.6GHz variety of the Northwood."
Maybe I've been absorbing the threads in this forum wrong, but I thought a number of people have been reaching a 133MHz FSB with P4's other than the 1.6GHz, like with the 1.8 and some even with the 2.0. Yes? No?
Also, the article says:
"the ICS DRCGs that come standard on this board, will only handle about 468MHz or 117MHz FSB for overclocking, without getting very flaky with the RDRAM."
Once again, has this been people's experience here? And when they use a phrase like "will only handle
about" it makes it sound like it's just sort of a fact floating around out there rather than their experience with this particular setup. That seems to be the flaw with this article, unless I'm reading it wrong. To say:
"we were able to overclock our 2.4GHz Pentium 4 faster than we ever could before, with standard air cooling. We used a Thermaltake Volcano 478 to cool our CPU and this little trick on our P4 Northwood (the vcore mod,) to get the core voltage up a little higher than the TH7II-RAID allows, to 1.9V."
implies that they did other things differently this time in addition to changing the DRCG's that could have accounted for the better overclock. There are no comparison benchmarks with an identical setup using the original DRCG's to see a direct result of the better overclock coming purely from the change in DRCG's.
Sorry to go on about an article from another website, but it seemed relevant to this thread and to this Abit board forum. I'm curious as to what you all think about this latest information as I have all the parts here ready to put together an TH7II-RAID system with a 2.0a P4 and 1GB RDRAM and want to get every ounce of performance out of it I can. And the DRCG's may be a factor in that.
This is all new to me, so I would love to hear what you guys think. I'm a newbie, so forgive me for running off at the keyboard.
Peace,
Eggroll