PDA

View Full Version : need some advise with going 2 rads and 3 blocks


Warlord2
06-19-02, 08:36 PM
I have a diagram of what my system is going to look like but Im not sure if its the best. Anyways take a look and feel free to make any changes.
http://warlordsdomain.freeservers.com/cpu1.bmp

JudgeDredd
06-19-02, 08:39 PM
Pretty red X. :)

Warlord2
06-19-02, 08:40 PM
ok that didnt work

I will just upload it here, only 92kb

JFettig
06-19-02, 09:09 PM
heres the pic, as a jpg, that looks pretty good, maby just go with the rads like that, but make them come together before the cpu and go inline for the blocks...

JFettig
06-19-02, 09:10 PM
i forgot to add the pic you had

Warlord2
06-19-02, 09:15 PM
I want to put a T before the cpu block because I didnt want the water flow to slow done because of the gpu and chipset blocks.

Also I might be puting a pelt on all the blocks in due time so I dont wont flow rate to be a problem.

Also everyone has been saying that if you have 2 rads you should go in series so thats what I did.

edit: thanks maskedgeek for puting up the pic, Im no good at webpages.

JFettig
06-19-02, 09:18 PM
*parrallel yea thats rite, thats how it should be if your using 2, and i say you should use the 2 rads in parallel, but have the blocks in series...

Warlord2
06-19-02, 09:33 PM
grrr

I wanted the rads in series:(

so you dont think I can have thim both (blocks and rads) in series?

DKYoda
06-19-02, 10:28 PM
But .. But ...:D
You have the rads in parallel ??
And the gpu and NB in series ??

~~Walks into wall~~

Looks like a nice path to me !!

~~Takes notes~~

JFettig
06-19-02, 10:37 PM
Originally posted by DKYoda
But .. But ...:D
You have the rads in parallel ??
And the gpu and NB in series ??

~~Walks into wall~~

Looks like a nice path to me !!

~~Takes notes~~

that can go pretty far, pleze explain.... i can see how/what your saying, kinda...

Warlord2
06-20-02, 12:45 AM
bump

if anyone is doing the 2 rad 3 block thing please tell me how you set it up


from what I hear you want the rads in series so that the water will stay longer in the radiators, thin in the blocks.

DKYoda
06-20-02, 08:12 AM
Originally posted by maskedgeek


that can go pretty far, pleze explain.... i can see how/what your saying, kinda...

I was saying ...
The diagram he had showed the rads in parallel ..
Thats all :D


What can go pretty far ??
Im confused .... Must have coffee ...:o

JFettig
06-20-02, 08:49 AM
lol basicly you can think of it as that, or some other things... i dont know anymore that was a sleep ago....

but yea i say you do it like this

-edit- the reason i stick the chipset block after the cpu, is that the setup will be more clean... it isnt gonna add noticeable heat at all...

Warlord2
06-20-02, 02:37 PM
ok now Im confused, I thought I had the rads in series in the diagram.

can someone show the difference between series and parrallel pls?

EDIT: nevermind I just read this (http://www.overclockers.com/tips915/) artical again and it looks like I just had parallet and series mixed up.

DKYoda
06-20-02, 05:19 PM
no worries man ...

Im the bonehead that was ready to put 200 Lbs of clamping pressure on my XP :D

When you read a few million articles on water cooling .. the mind plays tricks !!!
I read about 200 Lbs pressure on a article on glueing a pelt to a cold plate .. and it just stuck ...:beer: