Pro Noob
Disabled
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2008
Which would be better (higher performance):
CPU @ 425 x 8 (3.4Ghz), FSB @ 1700 Mhz, RAM @ 850 Mhz (4-4-4-15 2T)
OR
CPU @ 486 x 7 (3.4Ghz), FSB @ 1944 Mhz, RAM @ 972 Mhz (5-7-7-22 2T)
OR
CPU @ 454 x 7.5 (3.4Ghz), FSB @ 1816 Mhz, RAM @ 910 Mhz (5-5-5-18 2T) - Currently at this since it appears to be the "best of both worlds". Is my logic correct?
Is the upgrade in FSB and RAM frequency worth the downgrade in RAM timings? I seem stable on all settings. Which option will give me better overall performance...or would there be no noticeable difference?
Thanks!
CPU @ 425 x 8 (3.4Ghz), FSB @ 1700 Mhz, RAM @ 850 Mhz (4-4-4-15 2T)
OR
CPU @ 486 x 7 (3.4Ghz), FSB @ 1944 Mhz, RAM @ 972 Mhz (5-7-7-22 2T)
OR
CPU @ 454 x 7.5 (3.4Ghz), FSB @ 1816 Mhz, RAM @ 910 Mhz (5-5-5-18 2T) - Currently at this since it appears to be the "best of both worlds". Is my logic correct?
Is the upgrade in FSB and RAM frequency worth the downgrade in RAM timings? I seem stable on all settings. Which option will give me better overall performance...or would there be no noticeable difference?
Thanks!
Last edited: