Overclockers Forums - View Single Post

The Coolest · 06-09-06, 06:40 PM

If the board completely lacks memory divider setting then that is not good.
But if it will automatically lower the memory speed you can later control that with software in windows.
Either way I think that getting a Venice would be a smarter move + you can still OC a little bit, you get 90nm, SSE3 and a better memory controller.

06-09-06, 06:40 PM	#5
The Coolest Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Tel Aviv, Israel	If the board completely lacks memory divider setting then that is not good. But if it will automatically lower the memory speed you can later control that with software in windows. Either way I think that getting a Venice would be a smarter move + you can still OC a little bit, you get 90nm, SSE3 and a better memory controller. __________________ "<The_Coolest> You can't unwaste wasted CPU cycles" - Start FOLDing now! Main rig: Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz @ 4.5GHz (Scythe Mugen2) / Mobo: Biostar TP67XE / SSD: Crucial M4 128GB (+ HDDs) / GPU: HD5450 or 8800 Ultra / Mem: 4x4GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 4GBXL RipJaws X - 16GB total / PSU: Seasonic S12II 620W. Secondary rig: Core i3 540 3.06GHz @ Stock / Mobo: MSI H55M-ED55 / GPU: Integrated / Mem: 2x2GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 4GBRL RipJaws - 4GB total / PSU: FSP ATX350-PNR 350W. Core Temp - Accurate temperature monitor for Intel's Core/Core 2 and AMD64 processors Heatware
	QUOTE Thanks