- Joined
- Dec 13, 2003
- Location
- San Jose, Cali
I CANNOT use 10 or 10.5 multi's, so keep this in mind
I seem to be able to run at 230x9.5=2185, 2-3-3-11. (4 hours prime)
I also can run 212x11=2332, 2-2-2-11 (6 hours prime)
Sandra ALWAYS benches higher raw Mhz, it doesn't really take fsb into account on cpu (220x10 runs EXACTLY the same as 200x11). My RAM scored quiet a bit better at 230, even with 2-3-3-11.
Which one would have better "real life" performance? My comp is a gaming rig, no video editting or anything like that. From what I've heard, higher fsb is better for games. But 18mhz fsb worth losing 147 total Mhz?
Temps aren't a prob. with either. I'm using 1.9vcore, just to make sure I am pushing my cpu to it's max (which sucks).
Idle temps 34-36c
Load 41c
Help me! I've searched but haven't found much. I will probally flash to the d10 bios, but I'm using a new MB, and I've heard that d10 might corrupt my bios (i have a PLASTIC cpu lever)
I seem to be able to run at 230x9.5=2185, 2-3-3-11. (4 hours prime)
I also can run 212x11=2332, 2-2-2-11 (6 hours prime)
Sandra ALWAYS benches higher raw Mhz, it doesn't really take fsb into account on cpu (220x10 runs EXACTLY the same as 200x11). My RAM scored quiet a bit better at 230, even with 2-3-3-11.
Which one would have better "real life" performance? My comp is a gaming rig, no video editting or anything like that. From what I've heard, higher fsb is better for games. But 18mhz fsb worth losing 147 total Mhz?
Temps aren't a prob. with either. I'm using 1.9vcore, just to make sure I am pushing my cpu to it's max (which sucks).
Idle temps 34-36c
Load 41c
Help me! I've searched but haven't found much. I will probally flash to the d10 bios, but I'm using a new MB, and I've heard that d10 might corrupt my bios (i have a PLASTIC cpu lever)