Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 27
  1. #1
    Member CraxySerge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Niagara Region, Eh!

    New Thin Maxtor Drives, WOW

    Yesterday I went to the local computer shop to pick up a 40GIG drive for a friend of mine, and I got him the new Maxtor drive. Its almost 2 times as this as all the other hard drives out there. Anybody else seee those drives?

  2. #2
    Member ssgohan434's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Silicon Valley---> moved to Washington State
    is there any advantage to the small drives?
    E6300 @ 3.6gHz (watercooled)
    Gigabyte DS3
    BFG GeForce 7600GT
    TeamGroup 2x512MB d9 ics

    Heatware

    Crunchin' For SETI
    and Folding@Home

  3. #3
    Originally posted by ssgohan434
    is there any advantage to the small drives?
    less heat?

  4. #4
    Member SkaGoatMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Owen Sound, Ontario, Canada
    The Small drive is becuz they switched to using 40 GB Platters instead of 20 GB Platters, that means, the old 40 Gigers had 2 platters, made them thicking, now the 40 gig is only a single platter.

  5. #5
    Member wildfrogman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Sitting at my computer playing UT2004.
    Hmm i have heard about them going to be out soon, and hearing reports of them for sale is a good sign. I figure it would be awesome for sombody to be able to really pack in tons of harddrives in a normal size case or such.

  6. #6
    Member Mike K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    Well I'm not sure if I have the same kind you are talking about, but I have a Maxtor 15GB hard drive that I've had for about 1 1/2 years and it is not even 3/4" tall. So if it is the same you are talking about they are not new at all.

  7. #7
    Member cursor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Seattle, WA USA
    Can someone post a picture?
    This space intentionally left blank.

  8. #8
    Member PYROMANIAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    yea i got a 40gig for my moms new comp and its really really small...i'd say .5" thick if not smaller give or take a few decimals...really thin..when the HD came in i thought it was a PCI card from the look of the static bag b/c it was so small
    HD's: 1x250/1x320/4x750/3x1000/2x1500
    Storage: 9.57TB/8.71TiB

    "Look at the nations and watch, and be utterly amazed. For I am going to do something in your days that you would not believe, even if you were told." -Habakkuk 1:5-

  9. #9
    Member Mike K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    heres mine

  10. #10
    Member cursor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Seattle, WA USA
    pretty low profile. nifty. guess this saves Maxtor like .25 per drive in extra aluminum for the drive casing?
    This space intentionally left blank.

  11. #11
    Registered
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    HE HE HE GOOD ONE!!

  12. #12
    Member Mike K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    I just measured it and it's only 5/8" tall. I measured a regular drive and it is just under 1" tall.

  13. #13
    Member PYROMANIAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Originally posted by cursor
    pretty low profile. nifty. guess this saves Maxtor like .25 per drive in extra aluminum for the drive casing?
    probly..and the slim design looks cool too imo
    HD's: 1x250/1x320/4x750/3x1000/2x1500
    Storage: 9.57TB/8.71TiB

    "Look at the nations and watch, and be utterly amazed. For I am going to do something in your days that you would not believe, even if you were told." -Habakkuk 1:5-

  14. #14
    New Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002

    It's DiamondMax Plus 8

    It is DiamondMax Plus 8. It has one of the highest areal density among currrent IDE harddisks, with 40 Gb per SIDE (and per head) of a platter. It only uses one side of the platter, so it has only one head. Another new line of IDE harddisk from Maxtor, DiamondMax Plus 9, also has 40 Gb per side but has one head on each side of the platter giving 80 Gb per platter.

    This DiamondMax Plus 8 surprises many people because of its AMAZING transfer rate! It is now easily the champ in transfer rate, beating its sibbling DiamondMax Plus 9, beating even WesternD's JB series by a wide margin! How fast? Fastest 63 Mb/sec for inner track, and 51 Mb/sec average!

    http://forums.storagereview.net/viewtopic.php?t=6155

    http://forums.storagereview.net/viewtopic.php?t=5956

    http://forums.storagereview.net/viewtopic.php?t=5614

    It's access time is, however, nothing to shout about, being simliar to Dmax+9, and a tad below the older D740.

    Formal benchmark aside, what about real life experience? I have all the above three types of Maxtor harddisk, D740, Dmax+8, and Dmax+9. My main computing tasks are video and graphics which involve large files read/write, and true to its blazing fast transfer rate, Dmax+8 is noticably faster to work with.
    Last edited by Kirky; 10-24-02 at 11:57 PM.

  15. #15
    Member ssgohan434's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Silicon Valley---> moved to Washington State
    so is the harddrive faster than the 8MB cache special edition western digital harddrives?
    E6300 @ 3.6gHz (watercooled)
    Gigabyte DS3
    BFG GeForce 7600GT
    TeamGroup 2x512MB d9 ics

    Heatware

    Crunchin' For SETI
    and Folding@Home

  16. #16
    Member
    10 Year Badge
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Iowa
    Originally posted by ssgohan434
    so is the harddrive faster than the 8MB cache special edition western digital harddrives?
    doubtful. the 8mb will beat ANY 2mb at the moment.. but this is by far the fastest 2mb drive.. i've got one of these new guys and it just screams... much faster than my seagate 40gig...
    Intel i7-2600k
    ASUS P8P67 Pro
    G.SKILL Ripjaws-X 8GB DDR3
    Sapphire HD 7970 OC
    Corsair HX750 750w
    OCZ Agility 2 120GB SSD
    Cooler Master CM 690 II
    Logitech G710+ & G9x
    Dell U2713HM

  17. #17
    New Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002

    Faster than WD JB in transfer rate

    This Dmax+8 has average 51 Mb/sec transfer rate (TR), while WD 80 Gb JB series (with 8 Mb cache) 41 Mb/sec. Even the latest 200 Gb (66 Gb/platter) BB/JB from WD is no match in TR:

    http://www.storagereview.com/article...D2000xB_2.html (Note that BB with 2 Mb cache and JB series with 8 Mb cache are almost identical in TR).

    However, apart from TR, access time, cache and firmware features (e.g. 'tag-n-queue') are also important in determining performance. TR is not the all in all, but neither is access time or cache size. 8 Mb can be helpful but not in all situations. In fact many people think that 8 Mb cache has been hyped up for what its worth. The relative contribution to performance by TR, access time and cache to a large extent depends on your OWN hard disk usage.

    Dmax+8 is the FASTEST IDE hard disk in term of TRANSFER RATE now. So in the hard disk usage where large file read/write are involved in video/graphics, Dmax+8 is also the fastest hard disk FOR THIS COMPUTING NEED.

    I will concede though, for the usual/typical desktop and server environment where many mixed small to medium files are frequently accessed, WD 8 Mb with larger cache and better access time is likely to perform better than Dmax+8. But the jury is still out because I have yet to see a formal APPLICATION benchmark comparison of Dmax+8 with WD JB or other hard disks.
    Last edited by Kirky; 10-27-02 at 01:18 AM.

  18. #18
    Member ssgohan434's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Silicon Valley---> moved to Washington State
    so there both better at their own thing?
    E6300 @ 3.6gHz (watercooled)
    Gigabyte DS3
    BFG GeForce 7600GT
    TeamGroup 2x512MB d9 ics

    Heatware

    Crunchin' For SETI
    and Folding@Home

  19. #19
    Do you work for Maxtor, Kirky?
    lol

    Slick. I have had a 20giger' that is that small pretty neat little thing.

  20. #20
    Member ssgohan434's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Silicon Valley---> moved to Washington State
    with these smaller drives does it mean that u can fit 2 harddrives in a bay made for only 1? and wouldnt that make twice as much if not more heat in one bay which is bad for harddrives?
    E6300 @ 3.6gHz (watercooled)
    Gigabyte DS3
    BFG GeForce 7600GT
    TeamGroup 2x512MB d9 ics

    Heatware

    Crunchin' For SETI
    and Folding@Home

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •