Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    51

    what memory to get?

    what would be a better choice for setting up dual channel DDR on my GA-8IPE1000?

    2 x 256MB with a 2.5 latency for $199.

    or

    2 x 512MB with a 3.0 latency for $293.75

    both brands are OCZ DDR533. I know both latency and the amount of memory affect the performance but i don't know what matters more. thanks. I know obviously i can get 2 512mb with a 2.5 latency but its too much money. any input would be appreciated. I will be overclocking by the way just to make that clear.

  2. #2
    Member YellowDart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    3,684
    Go for the gig o' ram in dual channel mode. You'll get better performance with that setup.
    XBL Gamertag: Cr0wN0 .:. Steam ID: yell0wdart

    Powdered Toast Man
    ~
    p4 2.6c @ 3.3 ducted to TT SF2 .:. 1g corsiar xms 400mhz .:. DFI PS83-BL .:. (RIP)HIS 9800pro IceQ @ 425/370 (now running nV 7300 256) .:. SB Audigy MP3+

    yell0wdart ~
    Dell XPS 720 .:. Core 2 Duo 2.13g (@ 2.4) .:. 4g DDR2 677 .:. 2x 160g HDD .:. 7900 GS (@ 558/751)

    Heat

  3. #3
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    51
    what about overclocking? will i get better results with a lower latency?

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Ft. Hood, TX
    Posts
    1,725
    You probably will get better scores running your FSB high while your memory lower at tight (2-2-2) timings, using a 5:4 ratio. Depending on what processor you have, however, it may differ. Which processor do you have, I assume it's a 800FSB Intel P4, but what clock/multiplier.

  5. #5
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    51
    i have a 2.6C. I don't really know what the ratio is. i don't see any type of setting in my bios like that. but anyway, your saying a 2.5 latency would give me better speeds even though its 512MB less then the 3.0 latency? or are you saying that i will be able to overclock more with the 2.5 latency and that will make it faster. Thanks for responding.

  6. #6
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    51
    bump...

    i need to get ram soon to complete my computer... more input would really help

  7. #7
    Registered
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    23
    get the 2.5 kit because it will do better memory timings then advertised.

  8. #8
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    51
    well won't the 3.0 do better also then and run stable at 2.5? is that what your saying. because if i could get a gig of ram and run it at 2.5 i'd definatly do that.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •