Here's a spec chart:
http://www.viewsonic.com/pdf/compchart_crt.pdf
Spec-wise, the P90F wins coz it can do 1600x1200 at 85Hz. Whereas the G90FB can only do it at 75Hz. But after reading several reviews of the P90F, i've learned that several owners experience a slight concaving or convexing in display... even some experienced uneven colors and other anomalies. I have not found any negative reviews about the G90FB though. So now I'm having second thoughts on the P90F, it's a higher model than the G90FB but howcome it's quality if worst that the Gseries? So should I go for a monitor that is superior in specifications but with a couple of bad reviews or a lower end monitor with neutral reviews. Price is not a concern because they are priced the same here (which is another weird thing, coz again the P series is higher than the G series).
Or should I settle for the Samsung Syncmaster 957MB instead?
http://www.viewsonic.com/pdf/compchart_crt.pdf
Spec-wise, the P90F wins coz it can do 1600x1200 at 85Hz. Whereas the G90FB can only do it at 75Hz. But after reading several reviews of the P90F, i've learned that several owners experience a slight concaving or convexing in display... even some experienced uneven colors and other anomalies. I have not found any negative reviews about the G90FB though. So now I'm having second thoughts on the P90F, it's a higher model than the G90FB but howcome it's quality if worst that the Gseries? So should I go for a monitor that is superior in specifications but with a couple of bad reviews or a lower end monitor with neutral reviews. Price is not a concern because they are priced the same here (which is another weird thing, coz again the P series is higher than the G series).
Or should I settle for the Samsung Syncmaster 957MB instead?