Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    283

    What is the faster connection: USB 2.0, Ultra Wide SCSI, SCSI-2??

    Mainly I am concerned between USB 2.0 and Ultra Wide SCSI, or even Ultra3 or Ultra320 SCSI? I am looking at fast high end scanners and most use Ultra SCSI or USB 2.0 or SCSI 2, so I need to know what the fastest and then next fastest is?

    I don't know if it is worth the price of buying a SCSI card? or maybe I should just get a USB 1.0 or USB 2.0 scanner?


    Finanally, what is faster, SCSI-2 or USB 1.0?

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Member Como's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    2,642
    all i know is that usb2.0 should be faster than Ultra320, and probably cheaper too, as you dont need a card. ultra 320 transfers at 320 mbs, while i believe usb2 is over 400.

    The real question would be within the scanners themselves, as the speed would be more limited by the scanner itself than the way the data is transferred.
    This space is for rent.*


    *I'm Lying

  3. #3
    Member attack's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Dayton. OH
    Posts
    4,757
    I'd go USB 2.0...U320 may be faster (yes in theory usb 2.0 is, but in reality U320 is much faster), but the added cost, anoyance, arn';t worth it. Also your scanner can't even scan close to 400mb/s worth of data, I would guess 50mb/s would still be more than a scanner can scan.
    i5-3570k @ 4.5ghz WC'd
    MSI Z77A-G41
    R9 280X
    2x4gb PC16000
    256GB Samsung 840
    Sennheiser HDR-120's
    Dell U2713HM
    "Computer games dont affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, wed all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitve electonic dance music..." - Kristian Wilson, Nintendo Inc, 1989

  4. #4
    Very kind Senior Xaotic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Greensboro NC
    Posts
    2,579
    The rate on USB 2.0 is 480 Mb/s, NOT 480 MB/s. This is a factor of 8 difference. The rate for comparison is about 60MB/s and will be faster than either Ultra SCSI or SCSI-2.

  5. #5
    Member Illah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    2,565
    Originally posted by Xaotic
    The rate on USB 2.0 is 480 Mb/s, NOT 480 MB/s. This is a factor of 8 difference. The rate for comparison is about 60MB/s and will be faster than either Ultra SCSI or SCSI-2.
    Doesn't 60MB/s make it much slower, not faster?

    And yeah, I was going to say that USB2.0 being faster than high end SCSI sounded funny...

    --Illah

  6. #6
    Member tom10167's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Phoenix. YOUR HAIR IS GOOD TO EAT
    Posts
    4,575
    Originally posted by ajrettke
    I'd go USB 2.0...U320 may be faster (yes in theory usb 2.0 is, but in reality U320 is much faster), but the added cost, anoyance, arn';t worth it. Also your scanner can't even scan close to 400mb/s worth of data, I would guess 50mb/s would still be more than a scanner can scan.
    Why is USB2 only faster in theory?

    Off Topic! What's faster, Firewire or USB2?

  7. #7
    Very kind Senior Xaotic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Greensboro NC
    Posts
    2,579
    USB 2.0 is slower than SCSI U320 in both theory and practice, as noted above. Both the SCSI-2 and SCSI Ultra are narrow, 8bit, protocols and are much slower, rated at 10MB/s and 20MB/s respectively.

    With respect to Firewire and USB 2.0, the USB is faster, in theory, at 480Mb/s(60MB/s) than the Firewire, 400Mb/s(50MB/s). Both protocols have overhead and the USB packet overhead is higher than the firewire version. As a practical matter, use whatever you have, though the USB may be more accepted. The performance is very similar.

  8. #8
    Member FireMogle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Lawrence, KS
    Posts
    1,605
    Originally posted by Xaotic
    USB 2.0 is slower than SCSI U320 in both theory and practice, as noted above. Both the SCSI-2 and SCSI Ultra are narrow, 8bit, protocols and are much slower, rated at 10MB/s and 20MB/s respectively.
    But SCSI-2+ comes in Wide and Narrow

    I personally think the limiting factor in all this will be the scanner, and not the interface.
    It's hard to look at it like a learning experence.

    CPU: Intel i7 860 @ 4Ghz (22x182)
    RAM: 8GB G.Skill DDR3 1600
    Motherboard: Asus p7p55 lx
    Video: MSI N460GTX + Asus VH198T
    Hard Drives: AS596TB-32GMx2 RAID 0
    Other: HD-DVD/Blu Ray Combo Drive.
    All Powered by: Corsair 750W

  9. #9
    Member MuEagle05's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    494
    Firewire2 is faster than usb2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •