Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 32

Thread: 4600 vs 9600

  1. #1
    Member custom90gt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pueblo CO, when I'm not playing army
    Heatware Profile

    4600 vs 9600

    Hey guys,
    I know this sounds like a stupid question, but I have to ask. I currently have an MSI gforce 4 4600 and enjoy it a lot. My friend said he will sell me his new (still in box and everything) radeon 9600 Pro 128 retail for 75 bucks. I'm curious if this card is that much better than my 4600? I know it is but should I sell the card and get something else (I'm in college and have no money).
    I'm just curious to see what everyone else thinks. I score 16600 in 3dmark 01 currently.
    Desktop | i5 3570k @ 4.8GHz | 16GB Ripjaws | 2x 128GB Samsung 830 Raid 0 | GTX 670 @ ???/???? | 2408WFP |

    Lenovo X230 | i7-3520M | 16GB | 256GB Crucial M4 msata | 12.5" IPS |

    HP Mediasmart EX490 | E5300 | 4GB Mushkin | 6TB space, but could use more |

    Back home again.

  2. #2
    Member Evnas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    keep the Ti4600...its a faster card

  3. #3
    Member
    10 Year Badge
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Land of 10,000 Lakes
    The 9600 will do better in DX9 games. As for the 3DMark01, the 9600 will score lower, but that is based on DX8. Run 3DMark03, and you will see that you card doesn't score very high. This is where the 9600 will shine, in DX9. Overall, if you plan to play DX9 games, like HL2, then I would get at least the 9600, 9700, or 9800 series cards.
    Main Rig: Asus P8Z68 Pro Gen3 * Core i7 2600K @ 4.4Ghz * 8GB (2x 4GB) Mushkin Blackline PC3-1600 * GeForce GTX 560TI 448 1280MB * 6TB Storage * LG BD/RW * Lian-Li PC-V2000B * Dell 24" 2407FPW & Asus 24" VS248H
    Backup Rig: Gigabyte EP45-UD3P * C2Q Q9400 @ 3.2Ghz * 4GB (2x 2GB) G-Skill PC2-8000 * Sapphire Radeon 4870 512MB * 320GB Storage * Samsung SH-S203N DVD+/-RW * Apex Full Tower Case * 2x Dell 19" LCD
    HTPC: Abit IP35PRO * C2D E6600 @ Stock * 2GB G-Skill PC6400 * Geforce 8600GT 256MB * 640GB Storage * Lite On 16x DVD-ROM * 55" Samsung 1080p 3D LED LCD via HDMI

    Media Server: DFI Lanparty UT NF4 Ultra-D * A64 3800+ X2 * 1GB PC3200 * Powercolor X800XL * 14TB Storage * Lite On 16x DVD-RW

    Heatware

  4. #4
    Member custom90gt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pueblo CO, when I'm not playing army
    Heatware Profile
    yeah, i am concerned about the dx9 stuff. I want to play new games, but I dunno if I should save for a 9800 or something?

  5. #5
    Member
    10 Year Badge
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Land of 10,000 Lakes
    The 9800 would be way better than the 9600, if you can afford it, go that route. The 9600 is limited because of 4 pipelines vs the 9800's 8 pipe architecture. Save up for the 9800, it would be a better buy.
    Main Rig: Asus P8Z68 Pro Gen3 * Core i7 2600K @ 4.4Ghz * 8GB (2x 4GB) Mushkin Blackline PC3-1600 * GeForce GTX 560TI 448 1280MB * 6TB Storage * LG BD/RW * Lian-Li PC-V2000B * Dell 24" 2407FPW & Asus 24" VS248H
    Backup Rig: Gigabyte EP45-UD3P * C2Q Q9400 @ 3.2Ghz * 4GB (2x 2GB) G-Skill PC2-8000 * Sapphire Radeon 4870 512MB * 320GB Storage * Samsung SH-S203N DVD+/-RW * Apex Full Tower Case * 2x Dell 19" LCD
    HTPC: Abit IP35PRO * C2D E6600 @ Stock * 2GB G-Skill PC6400 * Geforce 8600GT 256MB * 640GB Storage * Lite On 16x DVD-ROM * 55" Samsung 1080p 3D LED LCD via HDMI

    Media Server: DFI Lanparty UT NF4 Ultra-D * A64 3800+ X2 * 1GB PC3200 * Powercolor X800XL * 14TB Storage * Lite On 16x DVD-RW

    Heatware

  6. #6
    Member custom90gt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pueblo CO, when I'm not playing army
    Heatware Profile
    yeah, I know the 9800 is way faster, but being in college and owning a jeep and a mustang kinda sets you back a bit, lol. I'll be saving till next x-mas.

    Oh, BTW, thanks for the replies, and holy cow that was fast.

  7. #7
    Member
    10 Year Badge
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Land of 10,000 Lakes
    Hey thats why we are here, to help out others. The 9600 is a great mid range card. Me, personally, I have owned a BBA 9600Pro and a BBA AIW 9600pro, so I like the 9600 series of cards. They are great for mild gaming.
    Main Rig: Asus P8Z68 Pro Gen3 * Core i7 2600K @ 4.4Ghz * 8GB (2x 4GB) Mushkin Blackline PC3-1600 * GeForce GTX 560TI 448 1280MB * 6TB Storage * LG BD/RW * Lian-Li PC-V2000B * Dell 24" 2407FPW & Asus 24" VS248H
    Backup Rig: Gigabyte EP45-UD3P * C2Q Q9400 @ 3.2Ghz * 4GB (2x 2GB) G-Skill PC2-8000 * Sapphire Radeon 4870 512MB * 320GB Storage * Samsung SH-S203N DVD+/-RW * Apex Full Tower Case * 2x Dell 19" LCD
    HTPC: Abit IP35PRO * C2D E6600 @ Stock * 2GB G-Skill PC6400 * Geforce 8600GT 256MB * 640GB Storage * Lite On 16x DVD-ROM * 55" Samsung 1080p 3D LED LCD via HDMI

    Media Server: DFI Lanparty UT NF4 Ultra-D * A64 3800+ X2 * 1GB PC3200 * Powercolor X800XL * 14TB Storage * Lite On 16x DVD-RW

    Heatware

  8. #8
    wow nice ti4600 score! get the 9600 pro dude! $75 is cheap! then sell the 9600 pro if you dont like it. if you do, sell whatever you dont want to keep. worth trying it out

  9. #9
    Member Evnas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Originally posted by bchur83
    The 9600 will do better in DX9 games. As for the 3DMark01, the 9600 will score lower, but that is based on DX8. Run 3DMark03, and you will see that you card doesn't score very high. This is where the 9600 will shine, in DX9. Overall, if you plan to play DX9 games, like HL2, then I would get at least the 9600, 9700, or 9800 series cards.
    The reason it scores low in 3DMark 2k3 is because it cant run the DX 9 tests, which severly lowers it (just like in 2k1, the GF4MX took a big hit because it couldnt run the nature test)

    There wont be any performance loss in DX 9 games because the Ti4600 doesnt use it. Any games coming out in the near future also contain DX 8 coding...the only difference will be the lack of PS and VS 2.0 visuals (which will be substituted for PS and VS 1.4)

    Most likely, the 9600 Pro will also be slower when actually running HL2/Doom 3 when compared to the Ti4600

    In short, dont worry about DX 9...it will be another year or so (at least) before it becomes a requirement of games

  10. #10
    Member AK50's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Michigan
    buy it than sell both and get an even better card
    Rigged up with:

    AMD x2 3800+ @ 2.4ghz | Asrock 939Dual-SataII
    120gb|500gb Seagate HD's
    2gb OCZ pc4000
    BFG 8800GT 512mb
    Enermax FMA 535w PSU

  11. #11
    this is why im holding onto my ti4200 for a long while and I doubt dx9 will be reqired anytime soon. even now many games will run on a dx7 card, even hl2 will but the visuals wont be so pretty

  12. #12
    Member Steven4563's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Northants England
    keep your TI4600 if u like playing games with AA and AF save up and get a 9800pro

    AK50 thats not a bad idea get the otherone and then sell both off them
    AMD Athlon 64 3200+ Winchester @ 250x10 = 2.5ghz 1.55V Cooled By XP-120 & YS-TECH FD1238 Fan
    MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum Edition
    Corsair XMS TwinX 1Gig 2x512Meg PC4400 Ram @ 416Mhz 2,2,2,6 1T
    Hercules 3D Prophet 9700NP 128Meg ( Bios Flashed To 9700Pro With VGA Sliencer )
    480Gig Hard Drive Space
    MSI 16x DVD Drive
    Artec 52x CD-RW Drive
    Creative SoundBlaster Audigy 2 ZS
    Antec PlusView 1000AMG Metallic Gray Case
    Antec TruePower 550watt PSU ( New Version )
    Windows XP Pro SP1
    3DMark2001SE: 23014


    4.9GHZ Of AMD Power For Overclockers.com Boinc Seti Team.

  13. #13
    Member Como's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Maine
    so a ti 4600 with bga ram would be faster than a 9600 pro with bga ram? i've been wondering myself. i see a 4600 with bga in the refurbs pretty often, in my range...about...and the 9600 pro with bga is in there sometimes too. lil cheaper, but i want raw fps, and a lil eye candy...
    This space is for rent.*


    *I'm Lying

  14. #14
    Member Steven4563's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Northants England
    then the Ti4600 is for u
    AMD Athlon 64 3200+ Winchester @ 250x10 = 2.5ghz 1.55V Cooled By XP-120 & YS-TECH FD1238 Fan
    MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum Edition
    Corsair XMS TwinX 1Gig 2x512Meg PC4400 Ram @ 416Mhz 2,2,2,6 1T
    Hercules 3D Prophet 9700NP 128Meg ( Bios Flashed To 9700Pro With VGA Sliencer )
    480Gig Hard Drive Space
    MSI 16x DVD Drive
    Artec 52x CD-RW Drive
    Creative SoundBlaster Audigy 2 ZS
    Antec PlusView 1000AMG Metallic Gray Case
    Antec TruePower 550watt PSU ( New Version )
    Windows XP Pro SP1
    3DMark2001SE: 23014


    4.9GHZ Of AMD Power For Overclockers.com Boinc Seti Team.

  15. #15
    Member custom90gt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pueblo CO, when I'm not playing army
    Heatware Profile
    wow,
    lots of replies this morning. Well I should have mentioned another part to this story. I told my brother and sister if they pitched in 50 bucks for me, I would either buy them the 9600 card and keep mine or buy it for myself and give them mine. So that throws out the selling both cards theory.
    I think I'll keep the 4600 for myself and try and oc it some more (anyone have any good ideas for that, I have a TT fan/ramsinks on it now).

  16. #16
    Member custom90gt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pueblo CO, when I'm not playing army
    Heatware Profile
    oh yeah, another question for you guys. I've heard that 9600's overclock like mad. Any merit to this rumor? If so, can it oc enough to make it worth getting over the 4600?

  17. #17
    Member PingSpike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Vermont, USA
    I'd keep the 4600 if I were you. Its the faster card, and what good are dx9 features if a game runs to slow to be playable? In the future, that speed edge may be the difference between playable and not playable.

    The 9600 is a great card, don't get me wrong. But I personally don't really care about the eye candy much, so long as it runs fast and looks ok.
    Epox 9U1697 GLI, X2 3800+ Manchester @ 2410mhz, 1.35v AC Freezer 64, 2x1024mb Corsair Value Select @ 221 2.5-3-3-10 2.7v, eVGA 8800GTS @ stock, 80GB SATA WD 7200/8mb, SB Live! value, 3Com NIC
    Heat

  18. #18
    yeah, since you already own the 4600, its not really a smart upgrade to go to the 9600.
    Main Rig
    Motherbard-DFI NF4 Ultra
    Processor-A64 3000+
    Vid Card-X800XL
    Memory-1GIG G.Skill 2-3-3-6 PC3200

    RIG 2| Asus p4p800 deluxe | 2.4c@stock | radeon 9800np @ stock | 2 80gig WD se's | 512mb Corsair xms
    Rig 3| Abit NF7-S | 1800+ tbred-b | (RIP)9700 np

  19. #19
    Member custom90gt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Pueblo CO, when I'm not playing army
    Heatware Profile
    well basically its a free "upgrade" I'm going to give my brother and sister 25 bucks and a card either way. I'm just trying to figure out which would be a better card for me to keep. If i can oc the 9600 to score good then I'll do that.

  20. #20
    Member violineb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Living in Baltimore/Studying in Bloomington, IN
    Well as far as the 9600pro goes for DX 9 games. Even my 9700 np lags badly in Halo. That's not saying much considering how Halo doesn't use resources well but if you want a DX 9 card to play DX9 games the way the should be played (on high settings then I suggest you either save for a 9800pro or buy and sell $75 is a steal in any case though.
    MY HEATWARE 27-0-0
    Main Rig: M4A79T-Deluxe, AMD 720, 2GB OCZ 1333, Radeon 4870 1GB, 2x Seagate 7200.12 RAID 0. Mods:PSX-Modded Laptop Dock Mini PC

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •