• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

fx5200 vs Ti4200

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

Marche

Registered
Joined
Feb 4, 2004
Hi I have found a cheap Ti4200 64mb will this still be better tahn 128mb fx5200?
thanks
 
The Ti4200 will be faster than the Fx5200, the Fx5200 can handle DX9, but its to slow to probably make any difference.

Verdict?

Ti4200 stomps it.
 
Exactly what they said above. Generally the 64mb ram on the ti4200 cards is faster than 128mb. In this case 128mb on a 5200 is just marketing and I am sure the ram is crap in comparison.

I have a ti4200 64mb card in my rig and I am happy w/ it. Very good card for the price!
 
I'm not convince yet with suggestion to buy GF4 Ti4200 instead of FX5200.

Which one is faster?

GF4 Ti4200 8x 128mb does 305/600
FX5200 128mb does 420/520 ( I think this one is better )

Unless Nvidia cut some more pipelines in its fx5200.

What do you think??

Later production of FX5200 has 500MHz DDR type of memory, and
I think it will OC to 600MHz DDR easy.
 
I have not seen anyone here post a good review let alone suggest buying a 5200!

The 5200 is a crippled card all around. Nvida released it in their fx line up but this card is equivelant of their old MX line up.

It is a marketing card that performs badly...they buy it for the FX name and get MX results! The Ti4200 is the better buy in this case. I am sure there will be a few replies to your post...get ready!:)

EDIT: Apologies..I just read yout part about later additions to the 5200 line up..these I am unfamiliar w/. i am curious to know if they perform any bettter. My guess is they are still low end cards and I have yet to see a 5200 card in a Mid Range VGA round up review...and definately not a high end line up.
 
The ti4200 wails on the 5200 in every aspect. Buy a FX5900nu for under $200 and laugh at both cards. But out of the two I wouldn't even consider the 5200.
 
Iv benched a fx5200 vs a semi oc'ed gf4 mx420 "ultra crappy" and it stomped on it so heh yea go ti4200, its a sweet card for the $$
 
rabdatrox said:
ti4200's can hit 17k...fx5200's at most 11k in 01'


And stock the best 5200's get maybe 7.5k and the 4200 hits 11.5
with a midrange system. 11k oce'd for a 5200 is not the norm!!.

In most cases 8.5k oc'ed.
 
OperativeSix said:
Lets put it this way. I've seen a GF4 4200 break 21,000 in 3DMark2001

The highest known 5200 score (hell, 5200 ultra, even) is a mere 14,238 .


You mean someone got a 5200 to do that? Ultra or not, that's not bad for a slow *** 5200.

Get a $30 4200 and clock the hell out of it, that would be the best bet till you can get a 5900, or ati 9700PRO and above.
 
football said:



You mean someone got a 5200 to do that? Ultra or not, that's not bad for a slow *** 5200.

Get a $30 4200 and clock the hell out of it, that would be the best bet till you can get a 5900, or ati 9700PRO and above.

Where the heck can you get a ti4200 for $30? Besides some crapped up ebay model...
 
rabdatrox said:


Where the heck can you get a ti4200 for $30? Besides some crapped up ebay model...

You seemed to have answered your own question.:rolleyes:

And if it comes down to spending anything remotely close to a $100, then neither of those cards should be an option, just my humble opion.;)
 
Back