• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

Aquamark shootout!

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

stratcatprowlin

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2003
Location
MG,Brazil
My stock Ti4200 almost scores the same as my 5600u lol.
You would think the 5600u would be way ahead in this benchmark.Unreal!
 
My stock Ti4200 almost scores the same as my 5600u lol.
You would think the 5600u would be way ahead in this benchmark.Unreal!
You would think:rolleyes: ......

Overclocker550 pointed out a distrubing fact to me. The 5200FX and the 5600FX ONLY HAVE 4x1 pipes....just like their MX cards:mad:

The Ti4200 has 4x2 pipes just like its 5900 bretheren
 
I'm not sure where the notion that 5600s don't suck would have come from. Only the 5900-5950 has any merit in comparison to the GF4Ti.
 
Sentential said:

You would think:rolleyes: ......

Overclocker550 pointed out a distrubing fact to me. The 5200FX and the 5600FX ONLY HAVE 4x1 pipes....just like their MX cards:mad:

The Ti4200 has 4x2 pipes just like its 5900 bretheren
AHA!!
 
Ok i figured it out,the last run was with AF set to application controlled so at 4xAF i guess 15.5k is the correct score?

I ran it again now with AF off and everything at stock speeds and got just under 24k so...I never ran the 5600u with 4xAF.
 
wow even better than with it off i was at 34.222
with it on app controlled and now with it on 4x
i am getting 35.305


nice
 
you know i guess it does i really didnt notice but i have had a 5700 u and now this i would go with this for the money difference it preforms better and cost less
 
I just got 45,662 with 1024x768x32, no AA, 4AF on the new 56.64 drivers.

My 5900XT was at 509/800.

decent?
 
Back