Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    Registered
    Join Date
    Dec 2003

    Im fed up with my RBX... Whats Next?

    Hey guys.

    Im totally fed up with my RBX as it is soo hard to mount right. Im looking for an alternative. heres my setup. BIX2 - ehiem 1250 - Res - RBX.

    Thanks guys...

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY

  3. #3
    Member jenkx's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    West Coast
    If you want to save about $850 instead of a vapo chill get a Swiftech MCW-6002

  4. #4
    Registered
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    How about something that will go good with my pump? How about the whitewater?

  5. #5
    Member jlin453's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    I had the same problems in the beginning mounting my RBX. Even chipped my core

    Did you try super glueing the nut at the back of the motherboard? If you do that it won't slip anymore when you screw on the other nuts. That alone has helped me tremendously and I don't have problems anymore

    But I do agree, the mounting hardware provided by Danger Den totally sucks.

  6. #6
    Member SysCrusher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Florida
    Quote Originally Posted by jlin453
    I had the same problems in the beginning mounting my RBX. Even chipped my core

    Did you try super glueing the nut at the back of the motherboard? If you do that it won't slip anymore when you screw on the other nuts. That alone has helped me tremendously and I don't have problems anymore

    But I do agree, the mounting hardware provided by Danger Den totally sucks.

    I agree. The mounting bolts SHOULD be properly anchored to properly mount any block correctly. Some cases come with threaded holes on the back plane for the mounting holes just for this purpose. I use washer, 2 nuts and a 1/8th spacer for each bolt on mine. Works great.

  7. #7
    Member Senater_Cache's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Gainesville, FL / Frankfurt Germany
    Quote Originally Posted by jenkx
    If you want to save about $850 instead of a vapo chill get a Swiftech MCW-6002
    I second that vote.
    The MCW should do good with your 1250 as it performs very well with low low-flow pressure systems.
    check out the performance of other blocks here.
    As you probably wont be getting much flow with that 6' head pump and that res, you should look fairly close to the left side of the graph AFAIK.
    Maybe im underestimating the 1250, though, so get another opinion on your flowrate.

    SenC.
    XP-M 2500+ @ 221 x 13 | 1.65v
    Abit NF7 | Mantarays XT
    OCZ PC3200 EL PE | 2.5-3-3-7
    9800pro XT PCB with Silencer3 @ XT-spec
    D4 | MCW6200 | 2-302 | Sanyo Denki | custom AntecCase

    ~--------------------~~---------------------~
    upcoming:
    XEON 3060 | eVGA_122_NF68 | 7900GTO | Crucial 10th Anny. D9GMH |
    DDC-2 PetrasTop | MCR320+Denkis | STORM | Stacker


    Heatware | Senater_Cache

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Sydney Australia
    this is for AMD right? i got the 478 version and im getting scared already...

  9. #9
    Senior Member Maxvla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    OKC
    well i had planned on getting the RBX for my a64 project, but now i think i'll switch to a Dtek WW unless anyone has problems with that block as well?
    The Black Hole
    Intel i7 860 2.8ghz
    Gigabyte P55M-UD2
    Mushkin 2x2GB DDR3 1600
    EVGA GTX460 1GB
    Intel X-25M 80GB SSD
    Magnetics - 2x2TB 4x1TB
    Corsair HX850W PSU
    NEC DVD-RW

  10. #10
    Member Senater_Cache's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Gainesville, FL / Frankfurt Germany
    I dont see the RBX's mounting problems (the only problem i am aware of with that block)
    affecting anything with a heatspreader.

    check this out regarding Performance
    Note that the WW is better than the RBX at any flowrate xcept 2.5+GPm.
    SenC.
    XP-M 2500+ @ 221 x 13 | 1.65v
    Abit NF7 | Mantarays XT
    OCZ PC3200 EL PE | 2.5-3-3-7
    9800pro XT PCB with Silencer3 @ XT-spec
    D4 | MCW6200 | 2-302 | Sanyo Denki | custom AntecCase

    ~--------------------~~---------------------~
    upcoming:
    XEON 3060 | eVGA_122_NF68 | 7900GTO | Crucial 10th Anny. D9GMH |
    DDC-2 PetrasTop | MCR320+Denkis | STORM | Stacker


    Heatware | Senater_Cache

  11. #11
    Member jlin453's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    As long as the mounting blocks are anchored, there is no problem.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Maxvla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    OKC
    Quote Originally Posted by Senater_Cache
    I dont see the RBX's mounting problems (the only problem i am aware of with that block)
    affecting anything with a heatspreader.

    check this out regarding Performance
    Note that the WW is better than the RBX at any flowrate xcept 2.5+GPm.
    SenC.
    yes i've been looking at that today.

    price is about the same so it was a toss up anyways. i disliked the plastic barbs on the Dtek so thats one reason i was going with the RBX.

    so you say the RBX doesn't have these mounting problems on any cpu with a heatspreader? i didn't read the whole thread, sorta skimmed a bit.

    i'm changing everything today was going to get a eheim 1250 but the D4 is looking very appealing and is similarly priced.
    The Black Hole
    Intel i7 860 2.8ghz
    Gigabyte P55M-UD2
    Mushkin 2x2GB DDR3 1600
    EVGA GTX460 1GB
    Intel X-25M 80GB SSD
    Magnetics - 2x2TB 4x1TB
    Corsair HX850W PSU
    NEC DVD-RW

  13. #13
    Member Senater_Cache's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Gainesville, FL / Frankfurt Germany
    Quote Originally Posted by Maxvla
    was going to get a eheim 1250 but the D4 is looking very appealing and is similarly priced.


    I dont own an RBX nor a heatspreader-cpu.
    I always thought the mounting problem was due to the block's base not being wide enough to make proper contact with the 4 cushions on XPs (hence the TDXs wide base).
    If that is the only problem, then theoretically any heatspreader should be fine.

    SenC
    XP-M 2500+ @ 221 x 13 | 1.65v
    Abit NF7 | Mantarays XT
    OCZ PC3200 EL PE | 2.5-3-3-7
    9800pro XT PCB with Silencer3 @ XT-spec
    D4 | MCW6200 | 2-302 | Sanyo Denki | custom AntecCase

    ~--------------------~~---------------------~
    upcoming:
    XEON 3060 | eVGA_122_NF68 | 7900GTO | Crucial 10th Anny. D9GMH |
    DDC-2 PetrasTop | MCR320+Denkis | STORM | Stacker


    Heatware | Senater_Cache

  14. #14
    Member jlin453's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by Senater_Cache


    I dont own an RBX nor a heatspreader-cpu.
    I always thought the mounting problem was due to the block's base not being wide enough to make proper contact with the 4 cushions on XPs (hence the TDXs wide base).
    If that is the only problem, then theoretically any heatspreader should be fine.

    SenC
    Well Danger Den supplies you with four extra crush pads so you can install them yourself closer to the core.

  15. #15
    Member Ancient_1's Avatar
    10 Year Badge
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Wisconsin USA
    I use an RBX and have never had a problem mounting it. For me tho the WW TDX or any other block would be just as difficult to mount since I use a P4 with the IHS removed. I have remounted it atleast 5 times from changing the plates or other things in my setup and have never had the so called bad mount. The bare core on a P4 is basicly square so even with it bare it is a lil easier to mount than the athlon XPs would be tho.
    As far as the WW performing better I am not sure since the tests I trust have used the #1 plate to test it with and I use the #5 which gives me better temps. For me the #5 is more than 1c better than the #4 and from what I can tell atleast 3 or more than the #1 that comes stock.

  16. #16
    Senior Member Maxvla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    OKC
    so plate 5 is 3C better than the stock plate 1 in your experience?
    The Black Hole
    Intel i7 860 2.8ghz
    Gigabyte P55M-UD2
    Mushkin 2x2GB DDR3 1600
    EVGA GTX460 1GB
    Intel X-25M 80GB SSD
    Magnetics - 2x2TB 4x1TB
    Corsair HX850W PSU
    NEC DVD-RW

  17. #17
    Member Ancient_1's Avatar
    10 Year Badge
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Wisconsin USA
    Yes as close as I can tell from the way I have switched things around. Dealing with the MB readings you can only be close since they arent very accurate.

    What I dont understand is why you dont see sites test with either the #4 or #5 plate installed along with the stock #1 since most peole that I know of that use the RBX use the #4 or #5 plates.
    Last edited by Ancient_1; 07-25-04 at 08:37 PM.

  18. #18
    Senior Member Maxvla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    OKC
    Quote Originally Posted by Ancient_1
    Yes as close as I can tell from the way I have switched things around. Dealing with the MB readings you can only be close since they arent very accurate.

    What I dont understand is why you dont see sites test with either the #4 or #5 plate installed along with the stock #1 since most peole that I know of that use the RBX use the #4 or #5 plates.
    for the same reason car magazines don't test every powertrain option individually for a given vehicle. time.
    The Black Hole
    Intel i7 860 2.8ghz
    Gigabyte P55M-UD2
    Mushkin 2x2GB DDR3 1600
    EVGA GTX460 1GB
    Intel X-25M 80GB SSD
    Magnetics - 2x2TB 4x1TB
    Corsair HX850W PSU
    NEC DVD-RW

  19. #19
    Member Ancient_1's Avatar
    10 Year Badge
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Wisconsin USA
    I agree but many do test more than one, like manual vs auto or 4 v 6.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •