Results 1 to 5 of 5
Thread: socket 940 and 939?
09-09-04, 05:31 PM #1
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Ottawa, CA
socket 940 and 939?
hi guys, ive been looking for a fx-53 chip and ive noticed theres 2 diff ones out there
one is socket 940 and the other is 939
i was wondering what is the difference?
09-09-04, 05:33 PM #2
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Cincinnati, OH
I would go for the 939 just because the 940 is a dead socket and there isnt much if any of a performance difference. Plus you wont have to buy ecc registered ram if you go for 939.
09-09-04, 06:17 PM #3
I wouldn't say that s940 is a dead socket, but it will require a ECC RAM that is more expensive, a bit slower and probably less overclockable. The s939 is the way to go when going with an FX"<The_Coolest> You can't unwaste wasted CPU cycles" - Start FOLDing now!
Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz @ 4.5GHz (Scythe Mugen2) / Mobo: Biostar TP67XE / SSD: Crucial M4 128GB (+ HDDs) / GPU: HD5450 or 8800 Ultra / Mem: 4x4GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 4GBXL RipJaws X - 16GB total / PSU: Seasonic S12II 620W.
Core i3 540 3.06GHz @ Stock / Mobo: MSI H55M-ED55 / GPU: Integrated / Mem: 2x2GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 4GBRL RipJaws - 4GB total / PSU: FSP ATX350-PNR 350W.
Core Temp - Accurate temperature monitor for Intel's Core/Core 2 and AMD64 processors
09-09-04, 06:34 PM #4
939 since not only u don't need registered memory but also better chipsets.
09-10-04, 02:10 AM #5