- Joined
- Feb 5, 2002
you could have gotten the s939 90nm winchester for the same price you paid for that 130nm newcastle. If thats the case, all the more reason my 3200+ newcastles being sold once the 90nm winchester comes 
-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
AMD starts shipping 90 nanometre Athlon 64s
- Thread starter mata2974
- Start date
- Joined
- May 30, 2004
mata2974 said:Somebody from http://www.xtremesystems.org managed to clock the
AMD S939 3500+ (2.2ghz) 90nm to 2.5Ghz, I cant find the thread,
anybody seen it??
Huh? That's only a 300Mhz overclock.
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2004
- Location
- Sylva, NC
DanIdentity said:
means hes got something like 11x227 or 10.5x238 or 10x250........u get the picture??
- Joined
- May 30, 2004
scooter787b said:means hes got something like 11x227 or 10.5x238 or 10x250........u get the picture??
Haha I guess I don't. Maybe I'm just tired...
OP
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
- Location
- Columbus, Ohio
- Thread Starter
- #66
......."The current core for the Athlon 64 3000+ CPU, codenamed
Oakville, will continue to be used for AMD’s notebook lineup until the first quarter
of 2005. The Oakville will then be replaced by a new core, the Lancaster, which
will have a 1MB L2 cache and clock speeds of 2GHz (Athlon 64 3200+) and
2.2GHz (Athlon 64 3400+)......",
Now 1MB L2 cache on a 90nm mobile sounds very good indeed....
Original story from HERE
Oakville, will continue to be used for AMD’s notebook lineup until the first quarter
of 2005. The Oakville will then be replaced by a new core, the Lancaster, which
will have a 1MB L2 cache and clock speeds of 2GHz (Athlon 64 3200+) and
2.2GHz (Athlon 64 3400+)......",
Now 1MB L2 cache on a 90nm mobile sounds very good indeed....
Original story from HERE
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2001
- Location
- Mauritius
Meant to be only 35W as well.....
OP
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
- Location
- Columbus, Ohio
- Thread Starter
- #68
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2001
- Location
- Mauritius
Hmm no SSE3 until rev E and also claims that cpus above 3500+ will be 104W....
OP
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
- Location
- Columbus, Ohio
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2003
- Location
- Denver, CO
Strykar said:
Not really. In past history the first out of the new smaller process was never an overclocking champ. Now with 90nm it is even harder. I was expecting this. Look at Prescott for example, it really sucked when it first came out, now look at them doing 4.2+GHz. Look at the first of the .13micron Athlon XP 2200's, they did not do good. Look at them now...my 1700 is doing 2.5Ghz....look at the mobile bartons....
Give it time and they will do better.
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2004
When does the dual MB come out?
