- Joined
- Dec 17, 2000
- Location
- Milton Keynes UK
All that I'm saying is AHD1467DMT3C - got one.
-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
nice little pally
- Thread starter wild_andy_c
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2001
- Location
- Trondheim, Norway
heh... que?
OP
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2000
- Location
- Milton Keynes UK
- Thread Starter
- #3
Model 1700 Palomino
OP
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2000
- Location
- Milton Keynes UK
- Thread Starter
- #4
The Palomino Model 1700+ will be clocked at 1467Mhz. And will eat a P4 1700 for breakfast.
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2001
- Location
- Fayetteville, AR
i assume that the speed is not in the stepping line (1467) and how does it over clock, and are the default temps lower than tbird?
OP
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2000
- Location
- Milton Keynes UK
- Thread Starter
- #6
You are looking at less than 40° with the Glaciator with 1.85v in it at a true 1656Mhz.
The 1700 relates to the processor rating number, the 1467 is the actual clock speed in Mhz. Truth of it is that it would probably monster a P4 2Ghz component easily - but they still choose to call it mildly the Model 1700. They have a lot more to come due to the fact that their migration to dot 13 will be 100% all at once, not bit by bit like some expensive chipzilla we know.
That will mean a LSB move to dot 13 and then a LSB move to SOI by 02H02.
The 1700 relates to the processor rating number, the 1467 is the actual clock speed in Mhz. Truth of it is that it would probably monster a P4 2Ghz component easily - but they still choose to call it mildly the Model 1700. They have a lot more to come due to the fact that their migration to dot 13 will be 100% all at once, not bit by bit like some expensive chipzilla we know.
That will mean a LSB move to dot 13 and then a LSB move to SOI by 02H02.
OP
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2000
- Location
- Milton Keynes UK
- Thread Starter
- #7
Yep, which is strange since my Mogran is AHDA
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2001
- Location
- West Central MN
Very interesting. Any idea when we will see the new Palominos available to the general public?
OP
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2000
- Location
- Milton Keynes UK
- Thread Starter
- #9
October 9th
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2001
- Location
- West Central MN
wild_andy_c said:
Sweetness!
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2001
- Location
- Croydon, UK
WOO HOO! just in time for my bday! hope the Nforce chipset is sorted by then.......
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2001
- Location
- USA Capital
So the "model 1700" is really a 1466(11.0x133.33). I thought the 1.533 were coming out on the 19th of Sept but I guess this date is when British spies get them 
Did AMD say anything about the model number thing? I think it is kinda silly but the general public might be ****ed when the boot up a computer and only see 1.466 instead of the 1.7 they will think they are getting screwed even if it is faster than a 2.0ghz p4.
Did AMD say anything about the model number thing? I think it is kinda silly but the general public might be ****ed when the boot up a computer and only see 1.466 instead of the 1.7 they will think they are getting screwed even if it is faster than a 2.0ghz p4.
el said:So the "model 1700" is really a 1466(11.0x133.33). I thought the 1.533 were coming out on the 19th of Sept but I guess this date is when British spies get them
Did AMD say anything about the model number thing? I think it is kinda silly but the general public might be ****ed when the boot up a computer and only see 1.466 instead of the 1.7 they will think they are getting screwed even if it is faster than a 2.0ghz p4.
i think the 1.533 is a palomino not a morgan
OP
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2000
- Location
- Milton Keynes UK
- Thread Starter
- #14
el said:So the "model 1700" is really a 1466(11.0x133.33). I thought the 1.533 were coming out on the 19th of Sept but I guess this date is when British spies get them
Did AMD say anything about the model number thing? I think it is kinda silly but the general public might be ****ed when the boot up a computer and only see 1.466 instead of the 1.7 they will think they are getting screwed even if it is faster than a 2.0ghz p4.
People listen to Atomic Guy too often. BIOS'es have already been updated to show these "strings" so no one unless an overclocker will ever know the difference. Just like the old Cyrix chips (not the Centaur ones - the actual Cyrix ones when they were PR'ed)
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2001
- Location
- VARIANTE ASCARI
I hope the new Palominos run a lot cooler than my TBird. It's at 40°C idle(running EB) & I'm afraid to check the full load temps . When this gets into Windows it already hits 50°. Thanks to a broken A/C. Sorry to keep bringin' that up but ya know how I feel. Right? A cooler running CPU Palomino be my next purchase if it'll fit my MoBo.
. When this gets into Windows it already hits 50°. Thanks to a broken A/C. Sorry to keep bringin' that up but ya know how I feel. Right? A cooler running CPU Palomino be my next purchase if it'll fit my MoBo.
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2001
- Location
- USA Capital
!-=sky=-! said:
huh?????? I was under the same impression.
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2001
wild andy i con't wanna know how you get ur hands on some of these things, but u sure get some kewl sh*t...do u know if the new pally will work in my KT7A-R???
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2001
- Location
- Queens, NY
i think it would but it wont read as a paliminoNyTe said:
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2001
but wouldn't a simple bios upgrade from ABIT, if they ever get off their Azz's, fix the SSE prob with the pally's? then wouldn't my board be FULLY capable for the palamino? or would it even register, cause i know they have a different sense of power than a norm tbird
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2001
I noticed that your Morgan does not like a high FSB is that Pally the same or is it ok with a high FSB.
