- Joined
- Feb 5, 2002
jonspd said:How is your score's so bad if win2k is faster and your running @ higher fsb and a newier cpu?
should I be getting lower than 35s at 262x9 1:1?
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
jonspd said:How is your score's so bad if win2k is faster and your running @ higher fsb and a newier cpu?
Aphex_Tom_9 said:it has a LOT to do with ram, are you running that 1:1?
Overclocker550 said:should I be getting lower than 35s at 262x9 1:1?
mantralord said:No, my RAM is running at DDR333...this Patriot TCCD crap caps out at 240 fsb.
yep, see it's all about the RAM speed (and controller) and FSB.TimoneX said:I got 32s should be able to get this down a sec or two in a couple days when I get better memory. Look and only 1.3Ghz too!
mantralord said:No, my RAM is running at DDR333...this Patriot TCCD crap caps out at 240 fsb.
Aphex_Tom_9 said:oh, hmm, im getting 34s with DDR514. 3-4-4-8 and single channel tho...
TimoneX said:...and what's your memory bandwidth & latency look like? Is that at 1t command? I suspect even at 218Mhz(DDR436) my dual channel bandwidth is higher. I'm right around 6700Mb/s as I recall. This memory(PC4000 EL gold) is capable of much higher speeds but not at 1t command and the bandwidth loss is huge, so this setting is better than much higher speeds and 2t command.
Overclocker550 said:lol its your weak ondie controller man, I can hit a little over 250fsb with my ondie stably and can do 3dmark runs in the low 260s with the occasional crashing. I tried 3-4-4-10 timings and it didnt help so this is more proof the rams not maxed.
" I got 32s should be able to get this down a sec or two in a couple days when I get better memory. Look and only 1.3Ghz too!"
yea you used clockgen to downclock your cpu after running superPI at your max oc. either that or photoshop
"oh, hmm, im getting 34s with DDR514. 3-4-4-8 and single channel tho..."
your 2.6GHz claw is doing bad, I get the same score with my winchester at 2.4 cause your ram timings suck and you probably got winxp too.
Aphex_Tom_9 said:yeah, im running 1T, single ch. this ram can do DDR580 with 2T, but my chip is a C0 revision, and cant do 2T. my bandwidth is like 3800 IIRC. there lies our difference.
||Console|| said:38 sec
I dont think i can get this down much more , board wont let me go any higher
TimoneX said:LOL dude you're a hoot. What did you get the generic A64 that came without a little feature called COOL N QUIET?
To accuse another member of cheating on a benchmark that's weak bud.
Why...why must you constantly insult other members and run them & their machines down? Are you really SO competitive you have to act this way? You accuse me of cheating and run down his setup and his OS all within a few minutes. Do you feel better about yourself now?
Overclocker550 said:did I say he cheated? no. he benched first then downclocked his cpu
Scph9002 said:Hrm.. so u think it´s cheating to use the prescott patch?? Isn´t i all about to se which computer that calculates a 1mb pi number as fast as posible??? So shouldn´t the app (superpi) take advantage of the whole cpu??? Well anyway without the patch I got 35 secs @ 3.7ghz and at stock speed a got 40 sec!!