-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
AMD superpi score
- Thread starter Scph9002
- Start date
Scph9002 said:
Hmmm, if you are getting a 32 sec time at 3.7 gig on a Pressie, I think you got the SuperPI program that is invalid due to the cheat. Fastest time I ever clocked on a P4 was 34 on a Pressie at 4.1 gig. My SuperPI program is the original one I got two years ago.
Try posting your time on the P4 forum and see what everybody thinks.
I get 31-32 sec on a Winnie at 2700 mhz on a S939 board. None of my monster P4 rigs running 4 gig plus can touch it, either Prescott or Northwood. I got ram running 3500+ unbuffered at 1:1, 2-2-2-5 or 2.5-2-2-5, full PAT. What are you running to get 32 sec at 3.7 gig?
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2003
- Location
- SF Bay Area
He says he's using the Prescott patch.
Gautam said:
But wasn't there a patch out that was a cheat? How would one know if the cheat isn't incorporated in the Prescott patch?
That's an awwfully fast time. It's so fast compared to a NW it smells like something's rotten in Denmark.
I could try the patch on my Pressies but if I got those times, if the 3DMark scores don't correlate, I'd take it with a grain of salt.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2003
- Location
- SF Bay Area
This is a cheat, perhaps I shoulda been clearer. It's most certainly recognized as a cheat by all reputed enthusiasts.
That's more like a 34-sec legit score.
That's more like a 34-sec legit score.
I know on a NW, 3.7 gig, even with 3500+ unbuffered at 2.5-2-2-5, full PAT, would get me 38 sec. I haven't run my Pressies that low, so I can't say. I get 34-36 sec at 4.0-4.1 gig with the old SuperPI program.
Anyways, on the AMDs, it's pretty automatic based on the size: 31-32 sec at 2700 mhz, 33-34 sec at 2600, 34-35 at 2500. If you got slow ram, add 1 sec to that. I'm talking Winnie on a S939 board, running stuff like 270x10, 2.5-3-3-6.
At 2700 mhz, I had same 32 sec at 270x10, 2.5-3-3-6 as 300x9, 166 divider for 200 mhz on the ram at 2-3-3-6! So the times seem pretty automatic based on size.
On a NC at 2700 mhz I got 33 sec, same as a CO Claw at 2600 mhz.
Anyways, on the AMDs, it's pretty automatic based on the size: 31-32 sec at 2700 mhz, 33-34 sec at 2600, 34-35 at 2500. If you got slow ram, add 1 sec to that. I'm talking Winnie on a S939 board, running stuff like 270x10, 2.5-3-3-6.
At 2700 mhz, I had same 32 sec at 270x10, 2.5-3-3-6 as 300x9, 166 divider for 200 mhz on the ram at 2-3-3-6! So the times seem pretty automatic based on size.
On a NC at 2700 mhz I got 33 sec, same as a CO Claw at 2600 mhz.
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2004
fastest i got my C0 Clawhammer @ 2.5Ghz was 35s ....2-3-3-6 timings on PQI TUrbo pc3200 (non TCCD)
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2004
- Location
- Calgary, Alberta
34sec @2500mhz
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2004
- Location
- Denver, CO
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2004
- Location
- Belton, MO
My best has been about 50 seconds @ 2.17GHz on a Sempron 2200+.
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2005
33 seconds. Winchester 3000+ @ 2.61, RAM at 3-3-3-8, 237MHz.
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2004
I suck, 36 seconds.
3000+ winchester @ 2.4 ghz.
3000+ winchester @ 2.4 ghz.
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2002
I get 35s at 262x9 and 34s at 266x9 the occasional time it doesnt crash, but ive got win2k 
- Joined
- May 10, 2004
- Location
- Brooklyn
best so far has been 34s, in a few days or so i think i'll get it down to 30-31
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2004
Why is mine so high...I have a 3000+ winnie at 267x9 and I get around 36/37 secs...
- Joined
- May 10, 2004
- Location
- Brooklyn
it has a LOT to do with ram, are you running that 1:1?mantralord said:
Similar threads
