Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
genjaguar said:Is it really worth having a more expensive one?
hitechjb1 said:The chip marking of my TCCD 4400 LE is 431. How does it compare to 440?
It does
2.5-3-3-7 1T to 303 MHz 2.8 V
2.5-4-4-8 1T to 318 MHz 2.8 V
3-5-5-10 1T to 350 MHz 2.8 V
hitechjb1 said:The chip marking of my TCCD 4400 LE is 431. How does it compare to 440?
It does
2.5-3-3-7 1T to 303 MHz 2.8 V
2.5-4-4-8 1T to 318 MHz 2.8 V
3-5-5-10 1T to 350 MHz 2.8 V
glock19owner said:Those are the same chips I have on my LC's...I knew it was this board
hitechjb1 said:Guessing:
Does 440 stand for 4.4 ns chip, and 431 stands for 4.31 ns chip.
jpm804 said:Acutally i think they stand for production week so the 431 is older than 437 and 440 TCCD. Lately most G.Skill modules should be 440TCCD
MoPMatrix said:I’m currently running my 512x2 LE's with 431 TCCD's at 275 2.5-3-3-10 1t 2.65v
I haven't really tried higher yet since I found the voltage sweet spot for these things. They seem to hate voltage, at 2.6 and 2.65 they will run memtest forever, at 2.70-2.75 they will get 1 or 2 errors after about 5 hours and at 2.80-2.85 they get a couple dozen errors in the first pass. This is all at 275 btw.
I personally prefer Mushkin's Level 2 Black. Its *far* cheaper and I get teh same results as the guy above.genjaguar said:Is G.Skill the best buy in memory at the moment?
Sentential said:I personally prefer Mushkin's Level 2 Black. Its *far* cheaper and I get teh same results as the guy above.