Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
WA2 said:Well, the paln was to pick one up..I was just curious what others thought.
Also, the 3500 is up for sale. I also just picked up an A64 3200 to see what it could do, been curios. But I will still have the funds from the 3500 (if it sells) to get a Venice.
how much you want for the 2.8 a64 you dont need anymore as you can see my winnie is a dud. it will only do 2385 @ 1.65vWA2 said:Just orderd the 3500 Venice...wOOt!
Burnt_Ram said:how much you want for the 2.8 a64 you dont need anymore as you can see my winnie is a dud. it will only do 2385 @ 1.65v
BeerHunter said:sucka today is tomorrow
WA2 said:Sweet!!! (u suck =P) BE SURE you let us know. I am so excited for this chip...feel like a child at xmas
Will the Venice be = to your FX if 3.2 is reached?
Great link, thanks!El<(')>Maxi said:Mr. Roadster did a very nice comparison between San Diego & Clawhammer. The .90nm chip was faster but not by a huge margin @ same Mhz. So if this is any indication, I would say mhz for mhz on Venice/Winchester it would be similar.
http://world.altavista.com/babelfis...sters.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=291&lp=fr_en