Results 1 to 7 of 7
Thread: Are these temps normal?
06-07-05, 08:49 PM #1
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
Are these temps normal?
I recently went to water cooling my cpu and video card because heat was causing crashes while game playing. The cpu would rise to approximately 80-90 deg C and the video card as high as 106 F. With water the cpu is a cool 39 deg c while the video card still hovers around 106 F. Setup is danger den's cpu and 6800gt video cooler with 3/8 id tubing fed parallel with a generic 120gph pump that delivers around 60gph though both coolers equally. I have not setup a radiator yet. Total coolant (distilled water) is around 1.5 gallons. Temperature reading for the cpu are from the bios and from case sensors inserted between the video card and cooler ( yes, AFTER cooler was installed )Are these temps normal?
06-07-05, 09:07 PM #2
Are you saying your running a loop without a radiator?
Oh, and to the forums!Desktop:
Q6600 G0@3Ghz,eVGA 8800gts,P5k Premium,2x2gb Kingston,120gig Agility 3,Seasonic S12-600HT
Toshiba M7(Tablet): T2300, 4gb ram, 160gb seagate
06-07-05, 09:38 PM #3
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
That's correct. I just got it together tonight and ran it to check the temps. With a big reservoir I figured the temp wouldn't rise quickly
06-07-05, 09:50 PM #4
who really knows, every body here are running radiators in their loops, if you had only pump running and system off, the water temps would increaseDell XPS 1330 T8300, 4GB PC6400, LED Monitor, DVD Burner, Intel 4965 wireless, Bluetooth 360, 9cell battery, Windows Vista Ultimate, Remote
Q9550, Gigabyte ex38 ds4, 4GB Corsair Dominator PC8500, evga 8800gt, Corsiar 520w psu, WD 640GB HD, LG Eide Dvd Burner, Antec P182
06-07-05, 10:55 PM #5
True, temps would rise and never fall below the coolest running temp because you have no radiator to cool the water. Temps seem nice considering you have no radiator.
I remember my first watercooling setup on the old T-Bird 1.2GHz machine i had. I started out with no radiator, and temps hit 62 degrees celcius before i shut it down. Of course, we're talking like 1998 or '99, when watercooling was in its infancy i guess.
How do your temps look after 2 hours idle? 3 hours? 6 hours?
06-08-05, 12:10 AM #6
More coolant in the loop just means it takes longer to get to a steady state temperature, but it will get there eventually although you (or the cpu) may not like the temp. Unless your reservoir can act as a decent radiator (heat dissipation device), the water temps will keep on rising until the heat dissipation equals the heat absorbed from the cpu and gpu. Since most reservoirs are not good for heat dissipation, the water temperature must rise higher to compensate.
Somehow, someway, you will be adding a radiator to this setup unless your heat output is about the same as my old celeron 300A. Sorry for the reality check.Rig#1: i5-3570K@4.4GHz, CM 212+ cooler, 7870 and 2GB 7850 crossfired, ASRock Z77 Extreme4 MB, TT 675W PSU, 2x8GB, 2x1TB HD
Rig#2: i7-3770K@4.3GHz, Zalman CNPS10X cooler, 7870 and 2GB 7850 crossfired, ASRock Z77 Extreme3 MB, Antec 520W PSU , 2x4GB, 1TB HD
Rig#3: i3-3225, i5 stock cooler, 7970 and 7950 on usb risers, ASRock Z77 Extreme4 MB, TT 750W PSU, 1x4GB, 1 TB HD
06-08-05, 12:25 AM #7
It sounds like you have a kind of weak pump. The gph rating is not as important as the head rating in WC systems because without good pressure, you won't get good flow through block restrictions. Your general concensus here it that your CPU and GPU would be better off running in series and not in parallel. You can always go with a dual heatercore.