Page 1 of 9 1 2 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 169
  1. #1
    Member WA2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    SLC, UT
    Posts
    784

    Nvidia cheating with #'s on the 7800GTX

    THought I would share some information Viper John haad about my card.
    Dude blows my mind! :P

    "I am forcing the card to run at the advertised core clock
    speed not the cheat speeds nVidia is running the cores at in 3D mode (about 40Mhz higher that
    what bios is programmed for or what you set the core clock at manually ). nVidia is also defaulting
    the driver to run at a "Quality" IQ setting instead of "High Quality" as a high end card should be
    running at (and what ATI does BTW).

    This BFG OC'ed card is advertised as a 450/650 . The bios is programmed for a 460 core clock
    in 3D and the that is what both nVidia's an RivaTuner default to on the manual clock sliders (as they
    should BUT when the card goes into 3D mode the core actually runs at 501Mhz or 41Mhz higher
    than it is supposed to be or what you think the core will be running at.

    The 3D core clock is actually set by the drivers. They read the bios to see what the 3D core clock"
    is programmed for or what you are manually setting the core clock (which over rides the bios
    programmed clock) and then sets that clock when the card goes into 3D mode.

    Through either an error in the driver code, or a deliberate act by nVidia, the drivers are taking the
    bios programmed 3D clock, or what you over ride it to manually, and adding 40Mhz to that number
    and then setting the core clock genrator to the higher speed without you knowing it. I don't it is a
    driver code error as NV did this before to make their cards appear faster to reviewers than they
    really were at the advertised clock speeds. This behind the scene (read behind your back and
    without your knowledge) 3D clock cheating appears to be confined to just the 7800's so that is
    another reason to think this is deliberate by nVidia and not an accidental driver code error.

    The problem with playing this stupid numbers game is if they correct the drivers to run the core at
    what the bios or the manual core clock are actually set for the cards speed will drop and users
    will be going "WTF", these new drivers are ****, they killed my card, they killed my computer,
    they burnt down my house, they knocked the moon out of orbit, etc, etc, etc.

    It will be interesting to see if FutureMark holds there approval of NV drivers that run the core higher
    than it is supposed to be running. They have pulled their approval in the past for that very reason."


    Hmmmmmmm
    Last edited by WA2; 07-01-05 at 12:55 AM.

  2. #2
    Member techun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,544
    why would they pull it for running the core oc/ed...when u can oc it, like everyone does. I guess im not understanding
    Sugo SFF cube case
    4850 45W
    4 gigs ddr2 800
    7200.11 500gig

  3. #3
    Member WA2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    SLC, UT
    Posts
    784
    No idea bro. Guess they want the card to seem faster then it is.
    Just thought I would pass it along.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    573
    Yep - pretty much all the benchies on the top scoring 7800s have shown the same "symptom" clocks always show up around 50mhz higher than what they were manually set

  5. #5
    Member willkill1337's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    irc.zirc.org - #octeams
    Posts
    647
    Is it not slightly lower in 2d mode as not to stress the card too much and generate less heat?

  6. #6
    Member WA2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    SLC, UT
    Posts
    784
    Quote Originally Posted by mikeguava
    Yep - pretty much all the benchies on the top scoring 7800s have shown the same "symptom" clocks always show up around 50mhz higher than what they were manually set
    mikeguava:

    Curious about your 850 clocks. I have never seen any that high, and the highest 3D05 card is not even clocked that high...maybe a mistake in the clocks??

  7. #7
    Member blitzkrieg1110's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,226
    i dont think its a mistake cause viperjohn modded it! hes........insane....to say the least :P
    Laptop: Dell Inspiron E1505 | Intel Centrino Duo T2300 1.67Ghz | 2GB DDR2 | Intel GMA 950 GFX |
    Heatware 8-0-0

  8. #8
    Member WA2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    SLC, UT
    Posts
    784
    Yes, I know. But I talk to john all of the time. He told me that he did not clock that card that high. He has not even modded one to that speed yet.

  9. #9
    Member crimedog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    South of Boston
    Posts
    3,468
    i'm very suprised no one else has reported this, all it takes is rivatuner to see which most of us run to verify there's no throttling and the temps are ok

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    573
    Quote Originally Posted by WA2
    Yes, I know. But I talk to john all of the time. He told me that he did not clock that card that high. He has not even modded one to that speed yet.


    Ooops yes you're right I copied the wrong clocks off another card - but they'll be much higher than that eventually...once Sandman's dual evap cascade arrives...
    lol we are right on the subject here- mikeguava cheating with clocks too! Corrected now...but hopefully soon changed to the upper limit

    BTW the highest core clocks for X850Xt series card were a tad over 900mhz and over 700 on the mem - top score of around 9600 points in 3DMark05-which is still not enough to beat a fully modded and chilled 7800 - which are over 11k at this point
    Last edited by mikeguava; 07-01-05 at 04:58 AM.

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    573
    Quote Originally Posted by crimedog
    i'm very suprised no one else has reported this, all it takes is rivatuner to see which most of us run to verify there's no throttling and the temps are ok

    Inother forums there have been various reports about the clocks being recorded higher than they were set. Confused already a bunch of peeps.
    There is already a modded bios out that doesn't differ between 2D and 3D performance...

    But there are 2 ways to look at it - it's beneficial for the "normal" user that when the card is not under full use of power in 2d to be throttled back - and when in need of 3D power the clocks are pumped up...can look at it as cheating in benchmarks if in fact future drivers will not have the throttle included - or - as power management for normal 24/7rigs
    Last edited by mikeguava; 07-01-05 at 04:59 AM.

  12. #12
    Member WA2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    SLC, UT
    Posts
    784
    Oh, I was jsut told that abou tthe 3d05 score. Did not check myself

    Quote from Viper :

    "753/672 for first place for x850XT's in 3DM05
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=970038
    but that card isn't even back to it's owner yet."


    There are single 7800's @ 11k???
    Last edited by WA2; 07-01-05 at 09:01 AM.

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    573
    Quote Originally Posted by WA2
    Oh, I was jsut told that abou tthe 3d05 score. Did not check myself

    Quote from Viper :

    "753/672 for first place for x850XT's in 3DM05
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=970038
    but that card isn't even back to it's owner yet."


    There are single 7800's @ 11k???

    yes - #1 Shamino watercooled @ 11300pts, #2 Oppainter watercooled @ 10930pts

    X850 #1 :Macci ln2 9600pts

  14. #14
    Senior Radeon Mod God ViperJohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Santa Ana, Ca
    Posts
    2,419
    Quote Originally Posted by mikeguava
    Inother forums there have been various reports about the clocks being recorded higher than they were set. Confused already a bunch of peeps.
    There is already a modded bios out that doesn't differ between 2D and 3D performance...

    But there are 2 ways to look at it - it's beneficial for the "normal" user that when the card is not under full use of power in 2d to be throttled back - and when in need of 3D power the clocks are pumped up...can look at it as cheating in benchmarks if in fact future drivers will not have the throttle included - or - as power management for normal 24/7rigs
    The 7800 core running 40Mzh higher in 3D mode than set in bios or using manual OC control is not a bios issue. It is a driver issue. The drivers are what acutally programs the core clock generator when entering 3D mode after reading the the 3D clock set in bios or the manually set 3D clock which takes precedence over the bios 3D clock.

    The drivers are just setting the core clock generator 40Mhz higher when entering 3D mode than it should. That could simple be a accidental coding error in the drivers (yeah right lol).

    The only issue is the core will be running 40Mhz faster than users think it is unless they use RivaTuner's graph to check it or look at 3dMark results. If NV fixes that whoop's in a later driver release that will open another can of worms.

    The card would of course bench lower with core clock set correctly in the "fixed" drivers and you would see the typical "WTF", "These new drivers suck", These new driver hurt my card", These new drivers hurt my system, "These new drivers knocked the moon out of orbit", etc, etc ,etc lol.

    Viper
    .
    GXT260/280's to 783 x 1620 / 1296 ViperFang-VII Water Cooled
    .
    8800GTS 512Mb to 885 x 2106 / 1224 ViperFang-VI Water Cooled
    .
    8800 Ultra to 756x1944/1269 ViperFang-IV Water Cooled
    .
    2900XT to 992/1197 ViperFang-IV Water Cooled
    .
    8800GTX to 756x1784/1161 ViperVenom TEC Cooled
    .
    Pictures at www.imageevent.com/marginjohn/viperjohn

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    573
    Quote Originally Posted by ViperJohn
    The 7800 core running 40Mzh higher in 3D mode than set in bios or using manual OC control is not a bios issue. It is a driver issue. The drivers are what acutally programs the core clock generator when entering 3D mode after reading the the 3D clock set in bios or the manually set 3D clock which takes precedence over the bios 3D clock.

    The drivers are just setting the core clock generator 40Mhz higher when entering 3D mode than it should. That could simple be a accidental coding error in the drivers (yeah right lol).

    The only issue is the core will be running 40Mhz faster than users think it is unless they use RivaTuner's graph to check it or look at 3dMark results. If NV fixes that whoop's in a later driver release that will open another can of worms.

    The card would of course bench lower with core clock set correctly in the "fixed" drivers and you would see the typical "WTF", "These new drivers suck", These new driver hurt my card", These new drivers hurt my system, "These new drivers knocked the moon out of orbit", etc, etc ,etc lol.

    Viper
    VictorShen posted a bios that supposedly takes care of 2D/3D throtteling and takes out thermal monitoring to prevent a coldbug.
    Prob. the bios allows and disallows the driver to change the clocks.
    Attached Files Attached Files

  16. #16
    Senior Radeon Mod God ViperJohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Santa Ana, Ca
    Posts
    2,419
    Quote Originally Posted by mikeguava
    VictorShen posted a bios that supposedly takes care of 2D/3D throtteling and takes out thermal monitoring to prevent a coldbug.
    Prob. the bios allows and disallows the driver to change the clocks.
    The 2D and Low Power 3D (commonly refered to as the throttle clock) clocks are easily changed on the 7800's with a bios edit using with NiBiTor V.22a. No rocket science there lol.

    I just want to see the core VID programming enable for 7800's in NiBiTor ASAP lol.

    Viper
    .
    GXT260/280's to 783 x 1620 / 1296 ViperFang-VII Water Cooled
    .
    8800GTS 512Mb to 885 x 2106 / 1224 ViperFang-VI Water Cooled
    .
    8800 Ultra to 756x1944/1269 ViperFang-IV Water Cooled
    .
    2900XT to 992/1197 ViperFang-IV Water Cooled
    .
    8800GTX to 756x1784/1161 ViperVenom TEC Cooled
    .
    Pictures at www.imageevent.com/marginjohn/viperjohn

  17. #17
    Former STASIS Guy
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    1,522
    Very interesting indeed. Downright dubious if you ask me! 40MHz will have a profound impact on the benchmarks if it is throttled back...the hairline victories in the reviews we have all read will no longer exist. Also, is nvidia so confident with it's yields that they expect every single 7800GTX to handle a 40MHz overclock?
    Why they simply wouldn't advertise the chips at the higher speed is an odd move. Unless they are trying to portray a "more efficient" product (look what we can do with on XXX # of MHz) they are foolish if this is in fact a deliberate move and not some unforseen anomaly.
    [un]Productivity System:
    -Lian Li V1200B Plus & TR-3 Fanbus
    -Swiftech APEX Watercooling / STORM Waterblock
    -PC Power & Cooling TurboCool 510 SLI
    -Asus A8N32 nForce4 SLIx16 Deluxe
    -AMD Athlon64 X2 4400+ (2600MHz "10*260")
    -2GB Corsair ProSeries XMS3500 (1T/CAS 2-3-3-6)
    -XFX 7800GTX Extreme Edition (520/1360)
    Cooled with STASIS IceStorm NV7800C5
    -(2) WD CaviarSE 250GB SATA3G 16MB in RAID0
    -Creative X-Fi Platinum / ATI TV Wonder 550Pro
    -Plextor PX-716AL Slot Loading 16X DVD+RW DL
    -Klipsch ProMedia 5.1 / Monster XPHP CL3 Cables
    -Dell 2005FPW LCD / Monster M500 DVI Cable

  18. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,460
    Quote Originally Posted by consumer9000
    Very interesting indeed. Downright dubious if you ask me! 40MHz will have a profound impact on the benchmarks if it is throttled back...the hairline victories in the reviews we have all read will no longer exist. Also, is nvidia so confident with it's yields that they expect every single 7800GTX to handle a 40MHz overclock?
    Why they simply wouldn't advertise the chips at the higher speed is an odd move. Unless they are trying to portray a "more efficient" product (look what we can do with on XXX # of MHz) they are foolish if this is in fact a deliberate move and not some unforseen anomaly.
    I agree completely. If this was a deliberate move to manipulate reviewers benches and the appearance of efficiency, it would be misguided, and in fact, regressive.
    "Pwned doesn't work when you literally mean "to own something"!!!"----g0dM@n

    Rig 1
    Am2 X2 5000+ Black @3.2 (246*13), 4 gigs ddr2 800 5-5-5-18 2t, Abit K9N-sli, X1800gt0 @ 681/630, X-fi Extr. Music, Coolermaster 600W, Raptor 74, Maxtor SATA 160


    HEATWARE

  19. #19
    Member wfarid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    727
    i was initially impressed with how low the idle power consumption was, but this kinda explains it. It might just be a bug in the driver, but for some reason I doubt it is.

    edit: thanks for the info viperjohn
    Last edited by wfarid; 07-01-05 at 12:39 PM. Reason: forgot to say some sh*t
    Main rig
    Gigabyte EP45-UD3P (F9b)Q9550 @ 4ghz, 8 Gb G.Skill; 1.5 * 2 Seagate 7200.11 in Raid 1;HIS ATI Radeon 4870;Creative X-fi Fatal1ty Champion; PCP&C Silencer 750; Lian-Li PC-A20; HP LP2475W 24"
    Laptop:
    Asus Z63a 14" ; 1.7 Pentium M pin modded to 2.26
    2 gigs of OCZ DDR II 533 Ram; 160gig, 8mb cache, 5400rpm hd; Atheros 5008, b/g/n; DL Dvd Burner

    MY HEAT

  20. #20
    Mr.Guvernment's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Costa Rica - and toronto sometimes
    Posts
    14,854
    god darn u NVIDIA, why not just say we run @ X speed - now your little behind our back trick has been found out and now there will be another FX fiasco! I think NVIDIA marketing department should be fired.

    ,`, Poor Planning On Your Part Does Not Constitute An Emergency On My Part ,`,
    ,`, The trouble with life is theres no background music ,`,
    ,`, Life isnt short, you're just dead for too long,`,



Page 1 of 9 1 2 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •