- Joined
- Dec 24, 2001
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
i highley doubt that.ChasR said:Not likely a bad WU on that particular project. Your OC may be a bit high to fold stably.
WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE TELLING MY SYSTEM OF STABILITY TESTING IS FLAWED?ChasR said:No one has reported stability problems on p890 to Stanford. Almost everyone doubts it's their computer that's unstable.
the TT typhoon is a rather amazing heatsink.i never thought id say that about anything made by TT but i just did.veryhumid said:39C is pretty low anyway. Thanks for adding all that megahurrrrrzzzz!!111one!
deathstar13 said:wth 5000 units at 16m a unit? finish date september 8th!
really my pc is rather fast but damn is this normal?...
is this worth the motherload in points or something?
AlabamaCajun said:Look at those LATS' ,;'
*Several memory tests have shown that memory performs fastest on the nVidia nForce chipsets at a TRas (RAS Precharge) settings in the 9 to 13 range. We ran our own Memory Bandwidth tests with memtest86 with TRas settings from 5 to 15 at a wide range of different memory speeds. The best bandwidth was consistently at 9 to 11 at every speed, with TRas 10 always in the best range at every speed. The performance improvement at TRas 10 was only 2 to 4% over TRas 5 and 6 depending on the speed, but the performance advantage was consistent across all tests. All benchmarks were run at a TRas setting of 10.
We have not tested a Socket 754 board that offered a CAS 1.5 setting. The OCZ memory ran without problems with 1 DIMM at 1.5-2-2-10 settings.
ChasR said:CPU-Z may report 0 but I don't think it'd work if the tRAS were really 0. Ive never seen a motherboard with tRAS lower than 4 available in bios. Here's a quote from Anandtech about latency on nForce motherboards:
The minimum tRAS would be tRCD+CAS latency + 2 cycles (to output the first burst of four and make way for the second burst in the output buffers).