Page 1 of 3 1 2 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 44
  1. #1
    Disabled
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    SoCal

    First ATI 1x00 numbers in: x1800 looks like a doozy

    They come from ATI but if they're true, that X1800 score in FEAR is SICK:

    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ATI/R5XX/

  2. #2
    Member tLove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    California, PA
    Quote Originally Posted by Bar81
    They come from ATI but if they're true, that X1800 score in FEAR is SICK:

    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ATI/R5XX/
    sweet. nice find.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    FL
    Looks good, On the X1800 Sell sheet, first graph shows the X1800XL twice. I'm guessing the top one should be the XT and not the XL?

  4. #4
    Member Aslan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    North Vancouver, Canada
    Interesting.....I'll wait for real reviews to come out before making any final judgement. However, the X1600 Pro looks to be quite a nice mid-level card, provided it can be boosted up to XT levels.
    RIP Tanya 1986-2008

    . . . . . . .. . . ... . .

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Atlanta
    Misleading to say the least.

    Also, as Nexus mentioned, they show scores for the x1800XL twice. Things like that are serious issues, but they lead some to question the credibility.

    The fact of the matter is that these "benchmarks" (which are from ATI themselves) tell absolutely nothing about the "test" systems, amongst a number of other unclear things.

    I'd say this is nothing but last-minute marketing at best. Let's wait for the reviewers before we draw a conclusion.

    deception``

  6. #6
    Contributing Member Sentential's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Midland, Texas
    Heatware Profile
    Thats alot higher than I thought would be possible with this card... especially the X1600PRO

  7. #7
    Senior Air Extraordinaire
    HousERaT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Imladris
    we should have something concrete in about a week...... I'll wait but this does look somewhat promising.
    CM-690 | Maximus Formula | Ballistix D9GMH 2GB - 4-4-4-10 - 2.2v (active cooled) | E6850 @4GHz (L719B) 602 Bios 500x8 - 1.475v | Ultra 120 Extreme | 2x HD3870 840/1300 | Lite-On 52327s CDRW | WD 74GB - Raptor HDD | Corsair 620HX PSU | Windows XP Pro sp2 |

    Support the OC Benchmarking Team The HD 4870/50 Thread The HD 3870/50 Thread The X1900XT/XTX Thread X800GTO˛ Thread Heatware

    Make friends with your "FAST" - 90K 01SE - 77K 03 - 29K 05 - 19K 06 - 274K AM3 - single card all air baby!

  8. #8
    Disabled
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    In 3 days we'll know but considering all the guys with cards in their hands are also getting these sheets I don't see how ATI can claim an 80% gain in FEAR if it's not actually an 80% gain. Then again, the real question is what are the in game settings, is this 640x480 with no eye candy or is it 1600x1200 with 6xAdapive AA and full eye candy. The former would matter not at all while the latter would be quite the achievement.

    Either way, these leaks are making things *very* interesting.

  9. #9
    Senior Member The Coolest's Avatar
    10 Year Badge
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Tel Aviv, Israel
    Heatware Profile
    Quote Originally Posted by deception``
    Misleading to say the least.

    Also, as Nexus mentioned, they show scores for the x1800XL twice. Things like that are serious issues, but they lead some to question the credibility.

    The fact of the matter is that these "benchmarks" (which are from ATI themselves) tell absolutely nothing about the "test" systems, amongst a number of other unclear things.

    I'd say this is nothing but last-minute marketing at best. Let's wait for the reviewers before we draw a conclusion.

    deception``
    I think you're both right and wrong at the same time.
    Yes these benchmarks are not really reliable, and are most likely not the same reviewers are going to get... BUT, they do give at least some general idea of what this new architecture is capable of, and so far its pretty impressive, for a 16pipe GPU.
    "<The_Coolest> You can't unwaste wasted CPU cycles" - Start FOLDing now!
    Main rig:
    Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz @ 4.5GHz (Scythe Mugen2) / Mobo: Biostar TP67XE / SSD: Crucial M4 128GB (+ HDDs) / GPU: HD5450 or 8800 Ultra / Mem: 4x4GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 4GBXL RipJaws X - 16GB total / PSU: Seasonic S12II 620W.
    Secondary rig:
    Core i3 540 3.06GHz @ Stock / Mobo: MSI H55M-ED55 / GPU: Integrated / Mem: 2x2GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 4GBRL RipJaws - 4GB total / PSU: FSP ATX350-PNR 350W.
    Core Temp - Accurate temperature monitor for Intel's Core/Core 2 and AMD64 processors

    Heatware

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Atlanta
    Quote Originally Posted by The Coolest
    I think you're both right and wrong at the same time.
    Yes these benchmarks are not really reliable, and are most likely not the same reviewers are going to get... BUT, they do give at least some general idea of what this new architecture is capable of, and so far its pretty impressive, for a 16pipe GPU.
    On the contrary, I think these sheets mean absolutely nothing. It doesn't matter whether it be NVIDIA or ATI - the fact of the matter is that information such as this from either company concerning their product is going to be semi-misleading to say the least. For example - NVIDIA recently launched its "Power of 3 Campaign," touting it's 'advantages over ATI' which include SLI, SM 3.0 and HDR. If you were to compare the 6800 Ultra to the x850XT, then yes the NVIDIA card would have an advantage in the SM department. However, up to this point only a handful of titles truly benefit from SM 3.0, so this 'advantage' is not as clear as NVIDIA would like us to believe.

    As I have said time and time again, we only have but a few days left. I will reserve judgement on ATI's products until then - so should everyone else.

    deception``
    Last edited by deception``; 10-02-05 at 09:22 PM.

  11. #11
    Member Sir. BOBSONATOR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    In Da Oc

    !

    Quote Originally Posted by Bar81
    They come from ATI but if they're true, that X1800 score in FEAR is SICK:

    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ATI/R5XX/
    WHO CARES About FEAR!!! BATTLEFIELD 2 AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH
    ||DFI-NF4 ULTRA-D||POWERCOLOR X1950PRO 512mb PCI-E||AMD64 3200+ Venice@(250 x 10)@1.45v CIPW W/Scythe Ninja||Corsair Value Select 1GB(2x512)@216 2.5/3/3/7-1T||Antec SP 2.0 500W Dual 12vRails||XP PRO SVP 2||SONY DVD-RW||Lian-Li PC-7BII|WD SATA 80GIG 7200RPM||
    Toothpaste + Vasaline=Thermal Paste Adventures!
    Ghetto Ventilation!!!!

  12. #12
    look at the price!

  13. #13
    Member TRF-Inferno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Lubbock/Carrollton, TX
    Quote Originally Posted by BluntStatic
    look at the price!
    Looks about the same as the 7800GTX. Those are MSRP prices anyways, so I think the 'Street price' should be a bit cheaper.

  14. #14
    Careface's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Dunedin, New Zealand
    Looks impressive to say the least, heres hoping they live up to the spec sheets.. looks like the 90nm process certainly has its perks

    Careface*
    One Team... One Universe... One Goal: The Truth...
    {OC*SETI}

    ...Because we are not alone...



  15. #15
    Member Gabkicks's Avatar
    10 Year Badge
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    do those cards suppord Direct X 10? or is dx10 not coming out for a long time?
    Intel i7 4790k 4.4ghz +H220-X| ASRock Z97x Killer | AMD Perf. 4x4GB DDR3 1866 | Sapphire R9 290 tri-x CFX| Samsung 840pro 256gb|
    640gig+1.5tb WD 7200rpm| Antec Twelve Hundred|Cooler Master V1000
    ASUS vg234QE 144hz monitor | CreAtive X-Fi XtremeMusic | Fanatec Porsche 911TS wheel Logitech g500. OCZ Elixir

  16. #16
    Member JDizzle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Houston, Tx
    So the X1600 does 5100 ok 35Mark05. Isn't that around what a x800 does?

    Those numbers are impressive nonetheless.

    Intel E6400 @ 3.2GHZ (1.36v) - Freezer Pro 7
    Gigabyte DS3 C1 F8i
    2GB G. Skill PK @ 400mhz 1:1 (4-4-4-12)
    Asus EN6200 8 pipes enabled
    250GB Hitachi T7K250
    Fortron Blue Storm 500W
    Antec P180

  17. #17
    Disabled
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Quote Originally Posted by Gabkicks
    do those cards suppord Direct X 10? or is dx10 not coming out for a long time?
    DirectX 10/Next/WGF/whatever isn't supposed to hit until Vista so we're talking 2H of 06 so I would presume that whatever they support will be limited and extremely hurtful on performance; akin to the situation with the 6800 and SM 3.0 - they could run it but it usually killed performance. It wasn't until the 7800 that it made sense as an option.

    Bottom line, yes they will support DirectX 10 but how well and with all the features is doubtful especially considering SM 4.0 is already being talked about.

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by JDizzle
    So the X1600 does 5100 ok 35Mark05. Isn't that around what a x800 does?

    Those numbers are impressive nonetheless.

    a 256mb x800pro costs $180 and performs like a 256mb x1600xt costing $250. They do have the 128mb x1600pro but it looks to be about on par to a 6600gt costing $30 less. Their x1800xl costs about as much as a 7800gtx but its slower. Only the x1800xt is as fast but costs more. ATI should have released their cards months ago now they missed the boat and must cut their prices down!

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by TRF-Inferno
    Looks about the same as the 7800GTX. Those are MSRP prices anyways, so I think the 'Street price' should be a bit cheaper.
    was talking about the x1300 forgot to mention

  20. #20
    Member TRF-Inferno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Lubbock/Carrollton, TX
    Quote Originally Posted by BluntStatic
    was talking about the x1300 forgot to mention
    Ah. Yea, the X1300s look like a real bargain for low budget gamers.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •