- Joined
- Dec 8, 2005
Hmmm.. a 920 overclocked or a dual core opty/or X2 overclocked for high end gaming and serious heavy muti-tasking? like a hard core game and browsing for "shortcuts", extracting a file, so on and so forth..
including the current info on the good overclocks on the 920 as of late. (with decent cooling.. say water)
I think if your into killer cooling (extream water or phase) the 920 just might be a better gamer.. at 4.7-4.8 GHz possibly+ or so..
ahhh when is conroe comming! Im not impressed with the stats on the 90nm AM2 news so far.. maybe the 65nm AM2's stats will be better.. (no clue on the actuall performace wich might be steller but at what cost?)
I want some future proofing.. and it seems CPU's are on a threahold of new tech that is unusuall (maybe all the intel PR is pushing this nonsence and I should settle for the dual core opty or try to get the best out of a 920 right now but I am willing to wait a few Q's to get something if it will be signifigantly better)
I have no rig to build on.. so that might make things easier..
any ideas?
including the current info on the good overclocks on the 920 as of late. (with decent cooling.. say water)
I think if your into killer cooling (extream water or phase) the 920 just might be a better gamer.. at 4.7-4.8 GHz possibly+ or so..
ahhh when is conroe comming! Im not impressed with the stats on the 90nm AM2 news so far.. maybe the 65nm AM2's stats will be better.. (no clue on the actuall performace wich might be steller but at what cost?)
I want some future proofing.. and it seems CPU's are on a threahold of new tech that is unusuall (maybe all the intel PR is pushing this nonsence and I should settle for the dual core opty or try to get the best out of a 920 right now but I am willing to wait a few Q's to get something if it will be signifigantly better)
I have no rig to build on.. so that might make things easier..
any ideas?