Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1

    Is a 2.8 Dual Core faster than a 3.2 hyperthread S478?

    Hi,

    Without overclocking, is a 3.2ghz hyperthreading S478 faster than a 2.8 dual core?

    Is dual core similar to hyperthreading? Is there a real world difference (with real applications, not benchmarking)?

    Thanks,
    RIch

  2. #2
    Hamm3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Varazdin, Croatia
    In apps that are multithreaded you will see pretty large performance jump, but 3.2Ghz will be little faster in single threaded applications.
    So if you use multithreaded applications I suggest upgrading to dual core. Otherwise its better to wait.
    P5B-dlx wifi
    Core2Duo E4300
    2GB Corsair DDR2 800Mhz
    Sapphire Radeon HD4850
    Enermax 460 Watt

    Support Overclockers.com DC teams!

  3. #3
    So in regular winxp pro, with mostly office applications, web browsing, email , some games, etc, the 3.2 northwood is faster than the 2.8 dual core.

    Wow, I havent upgraded in 2.5 years. I am dying to upgrade but there is nothing worth going to.

  4. #4
    Member Quailane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Who stole my white stars?
    Quote Originally Posted by richklein
    So in regular winxp pro, with mostly office applications, web browsing, email , some games, etc, the 3.2 northwood is faster than the 2.8 dual core.

    Wow, I havent upgraded in 2.5 years. I am dying to upgrade but there is nothing worth going to.
    Well, the dual core will overclock higher than you processor can go.

    Looks like you bought the fastest cpu available at the time. Without even overclocking, pretty much all the athlon 64's are faster than it.
    I DRIVE A HYUNDAI AND I'M PROUD OF IT!

  5. #5
    Registered
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Outside of multithreaded programs, there is another major advantage to dual core: multitasking.

    As far as hyperthreading goes, it's beneficial for the same things, but can in no way compete with proper dual core or dual cpu systems.

  6. #6
    Disabled DDR-PIII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    6p6
    so yeah your good unless your not gaming or doing cad

  7. #7
    I know this is the intel side, I went with AMD once with a XP1900. I was never impressed at all with it. I am a little hesitant in heading back that way & think I want to stick with an intel chipset.

    I just bought a ATI X800 XT AGP card. Is there any way to get an AGP card to play nicely with a PCI Express card?

    If I have the chance to buy a new PC without it costing me a nickel (recycling my old PC which is still pretty speedy), what could I get that would be faster than what I have?

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by richklein
    Wow, I havent upgraded in 2.5 years. I am dying to upgrade but there is nothing worth going to.
    I think your right, keep waiting till something worth going to, gets here.
    I'm sure your know it when it happens.
    Intel Core i7-4930K @ 4.2GHz ' Asus P9X79 ' Corsair 32GB DDR3-1600 CL9 ' 2x Gigabyte GTX 660 Ti ' Dell U3014

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •