Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Member party animal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Saratoga, CA/University of California Irvine

    Intel testing 45nm.

    According to Intel's website, they are demonstrating working 45nm chips. I wonder what kind of ocs we can get out of these

    CPU- Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
    MOBO- DFI ICFX3200
    RAM- 2GB CellShock 1000Mhz 5-5-5-15
    VID- ATi x1950pro
    HDD- Western Digital Raptor 74GB
    Western Digital SE16 320GB
    HEAT

  2. #2
    Member proth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In your mirror
    Quote Originally Posted by party animal
    According to Intel's website, they are demonstrating working 45nm chips. I wonder what kind of ocs we can get out of these
    By the time they release that, they'll be down to 16 stage pipeline running the core @ 2.0GHz

    Party is over for ultra high clock speeds after Cedar Mills and Pressler

    IMO
    PROTH, CONTACT KRAG ASAP, YOU DECIDED TO TRADE OUTSIDE THE CLASSIFIEDS AND YOU HAVE ANOTHER MEMBERS HARDWARE YOU VOLT-MODDED AND NEVER RETURNED TO HIM. BE A GOOD IDEA TO CONTACT KRAG BEFORE WE MAKE THIS A TROLL SITUATION-FORUM STAFF

  3. #3
    Member party animal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Saratoga, CA/University of California Irvine
    But if they are running 2.0 stock, i wonder how high they will go. Comparing apples to apples here.

    CPU- Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
    MOBO- DFI ICFX3200
    RAM- 2GB CellShock 1000Mhz 5-5-5-15
    VID- ATi x1950pro
    HDD- Western Digital Raptor 74GB
    Western Digital SE16 320GB
    HEAT

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by party animal
    But if they are running 2.0 stock, i wonder how high they will go. Comparing apples to apples here.
    That is a good point, i hope there better than $245 3.2 p4 Northwood

  5. #5
    $30 a phone d94's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    48302
    Quote Originally Posted by party animal
    But if they are running 2.0 stock, i wonder how high they will go. Comparing apples to apples here.
    if they hit 3, that's rock
    if they hit 4, that would be un-realistic

    'Wolfdale' and 'Ridgefield', for example, two dual-core, single-die desktop chips due 2008, will have 3MB and 6MB of cache apiece.

    These should appear alongside 'Perryville' and 'Penryn', respectively single-core and dual-core mobile parts, the former with 2MB of cache, according to the report, the latter with 3MB and 6MB of L2.

    On the server side, we have 'Hapertown', an eight-core Xeon with 12MB of cache shared between the cores. It doesn't look like we're going to see a desktop CPU with eight cores until 2008/2009, with the debut of 'Yorkfield', also sporting 12MB of cache.

    The same timeframe will see the debut of the quad-core 'Bloomfield', but how much cache it will contain isn't known. The same question hangs over the 'Silverthorne' mobile processor, for which we don't even have a core-count yet.
    http://www.theregister.com/2005/12/0..._45nm_roadmap/
    JESUS 12mb cache LOL 8x core WTH!
    Antec 300 Intel Q6600 @ 3.7 - X48-DS4 - 4gb ddr2 - 500w Earthwatt's - 52" Sharp Aquos LC-52D64U
    1x 640GB WD - 2x 1TB Greenpower - 2x 400GB Seagate - ATI 4830 512mb @ 680/975
    3DMark Vanage 7402 3DMark05 20,447 3DMark06 13,693

    Emachines amd x2 5000+ @ 2.9ghz w/foxconn bios - 2gb ddr2
    stock POS 300w - 400gb Seagate - diNovo + VX Revolution

    MacBook Air - 1.6ghz c2d - 2gb ddr2 - 80gb

    heatware

  6. #6
    Member proth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In your mirror
    if they hit 3, that's rock
    if they hit 4, that would be un-realistic


    LOL
    PROTH, CONTACT KRAG ASAP, YOU DECIDED TO TRADE OUTSIDE THE CLASSIFIEDS AND YOU HAVE ANOTHER MEMBERS HARDWARE YOU VOLT-MODDED AND NEVER RETURNED TO HIM. BE A GOOD IDEA TO CONTACT KRAG BEFORE WE MAKE THIS A TROLL SITUATION-FORUM STAFF

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    The Cockpit
    I saw a register rumor that stated the Conroe would have a model at 3.333GHz. On and 18 stage pipeline at that. I wouldn't count out high clocks yet. People have stated that you can only go so high with shorter pipes, but that is with AMD CPU's...not Intels. Intel has alot more money to develop technology with, and they got some pretty smart cookies there too. I think we better wait and see what an actual Intel will do with the shorter pipes. It may very well change rewrite the way CPU's work with these shorter pipes.

  8. #8
    Member party animal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Saratoga, CA/University of California Irvine
    i agree, im actually pretty excited about what Conroe can actually do. Intel has done pretty well with shorts pipelines considering the Pentium M and Core Duo.

    CPU- Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
    MOBO- DFI ICFX3200
    RAM- 2GB CellShock 1000Mhz 5-5-5-15
    VID- ATi x1950pro
    HDD- Western Digital Raptor 74GB
    Western Digital SE16 320GB
    HEAT

  9. #9
    Member Sjaak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Keep in mind that what they are showing here are mere samples of a couple of DRAM chips...it may take another year or two before they get actual 45nm processors working.
    'Apparantly reality has a strong liberal bias'

  10. #10
    Member >HyperlogiK<'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Sword Base
    Take all these things with a pinch of salt, Sony/Toshiba/IBM had claimed that they would have cell being fabbed on 45nm by the second half of this year, that then became 65nm.
    It's certainly promising that Intel are making such advancements, but these things take times as well as R&D money.
    The Last Gonzo of Scotland.
    Core i7 950 @ 4Ghz, Gigabyte x58-USB3, Radeon 6870 CF, Xonar D2X, 12GB Kingston HyperX 1600, Bigfoot 2100, Agility 3 120GB, 3x 2TB Spinpoint F4, Corsair HX1000w, Cambridge Audio A500 and Acoustic Research speakers (Main PC)
    Alienware M11x, C2D SU 7300, Geforce 335M, Corsair Force 40GB (Laptop)
    Opteron 175, DFI Lanparty NF4 Ultra D, Radeon x850 XT PE, 4GB BH-5, OCZ Petrol 64GB, X-Fi Xtreme Music, 2x TerraTec PHASE 22, Enermax Liberty ELT500, Yamaha A-S300 and Mordaunt Short Aviano speakers (Music PC)
    Pentium D 920, Gigabyte 965P-S3, Geforce 210, 2GB Elpida DDR2, TerraTec PHASE 22, ASUS DVB-T (HTPC)
    Dual P3 866Mhz, Intel 440LX Board, 1.8GB PC133Mhz, 2x Voodoo 2 12MB, Turtle Beach FIJI (Retro Gaming Machine)

    Heatware

  11. #11
    Contributing Member hUMANbEATbOX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    WINNIPEG REPRUHZENT!
    well intel has no shortage of r&d money, that's for sure.
    i7 970 @ 4.2ghz - 1.275v
    6x4gb
    560ti
    and my baby Lucy
    <----

    Do not go gentle into that good night,
    Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
    Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

  12. #12
    Member bobad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Louisiana
    Quote Originally Posted by proth
    By the time they release that, they'll be down to 16 stage pipeline running the core @ 2.0GHz Party is over for ultra high clock speeds after Cedar Mills and Pressler IMO
    I've been wondering for 2-3 years when the extreme frequencies would back off and they would go in the direction of smaller die sizes and multiple cores.

    Now I bet we'll see "Core Wars" instead of those insane frequencies.

    Hmmmm... wonder how fast a 45nm chip at 2ghz with 16 cores would be? Even a mild overclock on such a chip would gain a lot of speed. We just won't talk about multi-core heat right now. We can cross that bridge when we get to it.
    -=Bob=-

    Temporary System:
    P8Z68-V, 2500K@4.5Ghz VCore 1.300
    2x4gb Ripjaws X @9-9-9-24, VRAM 1.5
    Hyper212+ cooler, <15▲ idle, <37▲ load
    Antec Three Hundred Two case
    Antec Neo Eco 520w PS
    Giga GTX 550 Ti 1Gb gddr5
    Samsung 840 Pro 256Gb, WD 800Gb
    Crystalmarks 299,182+++
    SuperPi 8.331

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •