- Joined
- Aug 30, 2005
According to Intel's website, they are demonstrating working 45nm chips. I wonder what kind of ocs we can get out of these
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
party animal said:According to Intel's website, they are demonstrating working 45nm chips. I wonder what kind of ocs we can get out of these
party animal said:But if they are running 2.0 stock, i wonder how high they will go. Comparing apples to apples here.
if they hit 3, that's rockparty animal said:But if they are running 2.0 stock, i wonder how high they will go. Comparing apples to apples here.
http://www.theregister.com/2005/12/05/intel_45nm_roadmap/'Wolfdale' and 'Ridgefield', for example, two dual-core, single-die desktop chips due 2008, will have 3MB and 6MB of cache apiece.
These should appear alongside 'Perryville' and 'Penryn', respectively single-core and dual-core mobile parts, the former with 2MB of cache, according to the report, the latter with 3MB and 6MB of L2.
On the server side, we have 'Hapertown', an eight-core Xeon with 12MB of cache shared between the cores. It doesn't look like we're going to see a desktop CPU with eight cores until 2008/2009, with the debut of 'Yorkfield', also sporting 12MB of cache.
The same timeframe will see the debut of the quad-core 'Bloomfield', but how much cache it will contain isn't known. The same question hangs over the 'Silverthorne' mobile processor, for which we don't even have a core-count yet. ®
proth said:By the time they release that, they'll be down to 16 stage pipeline running the core @ 2.0GHz Party is over for ultra high clock speeds after Cedar Mills and Pressler IMO