Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Probably not ...jcll2002 said:wait is this more accurate than a bios reading?
Sorin said:http://www.tgdaily.com/2006/10/03/idf2006_technologyshowcase/
Click the image gallery link. Go to picture 12 of 39. Someone at the recent IDF (Intel Developer Forum) in San Francisco was displaying a C2D overclocked to 4.0GHz. In the picture Tom's Hardware took of what was displayed on the monitor, you can see that it looks like they are using Core Temp
Okay, well I thought it was neat at least.
1st, the expert has a known problem of reading low. I'd be very suspicious of 28C -- even water cooled. My 1st (rev AA0) was off by 10C and my 2nd (AC1) is off by only 2C. (I figured this out by clocking at 400Hz (yes, a 4800+ at a multiplier of 4 and a clock of 100 MHz), undervolting to 1.1v and letting it idle of 1/2 an hour, then comparing the water temperature at the exit of my CPU water block to the what my MB monitor was telling me).Kampfzerstorer said:Hmmm, I dunno bout this. MBM 5 and SysTool both agree on my Idle temps ~28C, this however says 45C (!) Idle (4400+ stable @ 2.75).
That's the first place I looked, it wasn't there. I double checked and I have data logging turned on but no log file that I can find ...The Coolest said:In the directory you extracted it to.