• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

AMD sending off s939 in style - 4000+ KAB1E

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

marscay

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2003
Location
London, UK
Now that conroe has arrived AMD have finally given me the golden chip i've been waiting for .....for only £83 :beer:

craziest thing is that this is only @ 1.5v

35ghzah5.jpg
 
n3lson said:
yeah ur right Gautum, he has good speed but his temps are way to high. ;)


how is his temp too high? hes only feeding it 1.5 ;)

thats a nice chip, wish i had something cold to put on mine :(
 
Gautam said:
Very nice, but look at his temperature guys. ;)

What week is that?

yeh these last batches of 939 seem to be flying - it's a 0626fpmw

VERY hot chip though ..makes my opteron 148 look like a mobile, i really think these could be fx-57's everybody is getting 3ghz+ on air with stock volts or close to it.
 
Last edited:
Damn, you hit the goldmine. lol nice chip! nice clock!

52c? Not to bad.. I wouldnt go much higher though

Also, cpu-z and the readings in the bottom right are different. cpuz says 3.5 and bottom right says 3.2
 
very nice oc man. wow, this is insanity, i just looked on newegg...:drool: what happened?!?! lol. i'm telling you guys, somthing big must be coming a lot sooner than we though. we know the new opterons are out. the AM2 version(1000 series) is due out soon. maybe 65nm will come early :bday:, the new opties do use the Direct Connect Architecture, that's supposed to make a huge difference. well wtv it is that's coming soon from AMD i can't wait.
 
That's sweet dude, nice job.


hitbyaprkedcar7 said:
Damn, you hit the goldmine. lol nice chip! nice clock!

52c? Not to bad.. I wouldnt go much higher though

Also, cpu-z and the readings in the bottom right are different. cpuz says 3.5 and bottom right says 3.2

That's negative 52. ;) Or -4c, depending on which one we should believe.

But yeah, what's the deal with two different reported speeds?
 
holy cow, that's awesome. almost makes me want to ditch my dual core. almost. :D
 
damarble said:
That's sweet dude, nice job.




That's negative 52. ;) Or -4c, depending on which one we should believe.

But yeah, what's the deal with two different reported speeds?


I would bet that MBM is reading wrong. It's showing the Core clock as 3.2
 
damarble said:
That's sweet dude, nice job.




That's negative 52. ;) Or -4c, depending on which one we should believe.

But yeah, what's the deal with two different reported speeds?


Ohh dayum! didnt see the negative LOL i saw the -4 on the mobo readings so i thought the readings were all wacked out
 
Back